Commit graph

17 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alam Ed Arias
9301344003 Merge branch 'macosx-hacking' into 'master'
OS X Makefile build setup

This merge request:

* Cleans up the OS X bundle resource location code and fixes a SIGSEGV and memory leak
* Simplifies and fixes the OS X desktop alert code, closing more leaks
* Adds the MACOSX build flag to the Makefiles, to allow building a binary (but not Mac app yet) of SRB2.

This is intended to make it easier for developers to build on Mac OS X, without having to pull in all of XCode. You can keep using CMake if you prefer.

To test, use `make -C src MACOSX=1 NONX86=1 SDL=1 NOASM=1` for a release build.

Left to do:

* Add a content bundling script to be run after building, and a flag to trigger doing that.
  `MACOSX_BUNDLE` maybe?
* Somehow get access to a Mac running PowerPC and figure out how to build a multi-platform binary.
* Add the proper magic to compile using gcc if requested. (Right now, compilation is done via LLVM/Clang)

See merge request !72
2016-07-21 15:38:46 -04:00
Alam Ed Arias
1a0fcbd8dc Revert "Merge branch 'RemoveINetC' into 'master'"
This reverts commit 8607f5247c, reversing
changes made to 11d76a6562.
2016-07-21 14:42:00 -04:00
Alam Ed Arias
8607f5247c Merge branch 'RemoveINetC' into 'master'
Remove i_net.c

The code in i_net.c doesn't actually seem to be used in SRB2. I was able to compile a build without it, and hosting and joining netgames worked just fine (well, as fine as they can with the current state of the netcode...).

The vast majority of code in the file seems to be contained in HAVE_SDLNET ifdefs, and I'm pretty sure SRB2 has never used SDLNET in a public build. The only bit not contained in that block is I_InitNetwork(), which just prints an error and returns false.

Do we really need to keep it around? If not, I say get rid of it. It seems like useless clutter that is just going to confuse people who are trying to understand the source code.

See merge request !73
2016-07-21 14:15:58 -04:00
Alam Ed Arias
869d582cc4 Makefile: ignore suggest=attribute for GCC 4.6 and up 2016-05-27 01:55:52 -04:00
Hank Brannock
f94d3a1fb0 The code in i_net.c doesn't actually seem to be used in SRB2. I was able to compile a build without it, and hosting and joining netgames worked just fine (well, as fine as they can with the current state of the netcode...).
Do we really need to keep it around? If not, I say get rid of it. It seems like useless clutter that is just going to confuse people who are trying to understand the source code.
2016-05-22 22:38:16 -04:00
yoshibot
8fbc0d7f69 remove bogus homebrew gzip; objdump allowed to fail in that way 2016-05-18 23:52:06 -05:00
yoshibot
df89563882 Add a way to build OS X binaries (not .app) through Makefiles 2016-05-18 19:14:53 -05:00
Alam Ed Arias
7fdb5cfcfb move disabled warning out of mingw 2016-01-28 12:06:00 -05:00
Alam Ed Arias
2176b21e62 ignore noreturns 2016-01-28 11:49:23 -05:00
Alam Ed Arias
d0ce9170da appveyor: build for GCC 5.2 2016-01-27 01:39:12 -05:00
Alam Ed Arias
b1e1163b91 evil changes 2014-08-27 22:43:10 -04:00
Alam Ed Arias
7cb77075d1 SRB2 2.1.11 release 2014-08-26 23:56:30 -04:00
Ronald Kinard
25739b38e3 INTERFACE=sdl 2014-08-04 00:27:12 -05:00
Alam Ed Arias
c028c83235 SRB2 2.1.9 release 2014-08-03 23:49:33 -04:00
Ronald Kinard
03fe3bdad2 Replace sdl with sdl2
SDL1.2 is dead, long live SDL
2014-07-26 02:06:00 -05:00
Ronald Kinard
2a827a98bb Initial SDL2 renderer impmlementation work. 2014-03-19 02:31:50 -05:00
Alam Ed Arias
b93cb1b65a SRB2 2.1 release 2014-03-15 13:11:35 -04:00