qzdoom/tools/re2c/doc/sample.bib

48 lines
2.4 KiB
BibTeX

@Article{Bumbulis94,
author = {Peter Bumbulis and Donald D. Cowan},
title = {RE2C -- A More Versatile Scanner Generator},
journal = "ACM Letters on Programming Languages and Systems",
volume = 2,
number = "1--4",
year = 1994,
abstract = {
It is usually claimed that lexical analysis routines are still coded by
hand, despite the widespread availability of scanner generators, for
efficiency reasons. While efficiency is a consideration, there exist
freely available scanner generators such as GLA \cite{Gray88} that can
generate scanners that are faster than most hand-coded ones. However,
most generated scanners are tailored for a particular environment, and
retargetting these scanners to other environments, if possible, is
usually complex enough to make a hand-coded scanner more appealing. In
this paper we describe RE2C, a scanner generator that not only generates
scanners which are faster (and usually smaller) than those produced by
any other scanner generator known to the authors, including GLA, but
also adapt easily to any environment.
}
}
@Article{Gray88,
author = {Robert W. Gray},
title = {{$\gamma$-GLA} - {A} Generator for Lexical Analyzers That
Programmers Can Use},
journal = {USENIX Conference Proceedings},
year = {1988},
month = {June},
pages = {147-160},
abstract = {Writing an efficient lexical analyzer for even a simple
language is not a trivial task, and should not be done by hand. We
describe GLA, a tool that generates very efficient scanners. These
scanners do not use the conventional transition matrix, but instead
use a few 128 element vectors. Scanning time is only slightly
greater than the absolute minimum --- the time it takes to look at
each character in a file. The GLA language allows simple, concise
specification of scanners. Augmenting regular expressions with
auxiliary scanners easily handles nasty problems such as C comments
and C literal constants. We formalize the connection between token
scanning and token processing by associating a processor with
appropriate patterns. A library of canned descriptions simplifies the
specification of commonly used language pieces --- such as,
C\_IDENTIFIERS, C\_STRINGS, PASCAL\_COMMENTS, etc. Finally, carefully
tuned lexical analysis support modules are provided for error
handling, input buffering, storing identifiers in hash tables and
manipulating denotations.}
}