This fits in nicely with the rest of the generic type system and makes
it a little more useful. The idea is it will take a return type (already
does since type functions always require a parameter at this stage) and
a parameter list (not implemented yet). It currently resolves to the
basic void (...) function type for QC.
It turns out they're not needed as the difficulty of quakec function
declarations (function fields) is taken care of by qc_function_spec.
Also, they made it difficult to think about function declarations.
The expression grammar has been tidied up and some basic checks are made
of parameters to the type functions. Also, type parameters are looked up
so parsing now works properly. However, the type parameters are not used
correctly, so function generation doesn't work.
The semantics are only partially implemented (generic types not yet
generated), but the generic scope for function declarations seems to be
working as intended in that it gets inserted in the scope chain and
removed at the end of the declaration.
The end goal is to allow generic and/or template functions, but this
allows types to be specified parametrically, eg vectors of specific type
and width, with widths of one becoming scalars.
Matrices are currently completely broken as I haven't decided on how to
represent the columns (rows is represented by width (column-major
storage)), and bools are only partially supported (need to sort out
32-bit vs 64-bit bools).
No semantics yet, but qfcc can parse some of QF's shaders. The grammar
mostly follows that in the OpenGL Shading Language, Version 4.60.7 spec,
but with a few less tokens.
This gets the types such that either there is only one definition, or C
sees the same name for what is essentially the same type despite there
being multiple local definitions.
There were a few places where some const-casts were needed, but they're
localized to code that's supposed to manipulate types (but I do want to
come up with something to clean that up).
I'm not sure the regressive product is right (overall sign), but that's
actually partly a problem in the math itself (duals and the regressive
product still get poked at, so it may be just a matter of
interpretation).
I'm surprised it took almost two years to discover that I had no
quaternion multiplications in any test code, but getting an ICE for a
quaternion-vector product, and the Hadamard product for
quaternion-quaternion was a bit of a nasty surprise.
I had wanted to do this earlier but shied away from the large edit. Now
it became more necessary (and will become even more necessary when I get
to the glsl front-end).
This will be used for unifying preprocessing and parsing, the idea being
that the tokens will be recorded for later expansion via macros, without
the need to retokenize.
The improved location tracking isn't used yet, but was fairly invasive
on the bison-flex api.
It also cleans up some of the ancient workarounds for bad flex cores.
Or at least mostly so (there are a few casts). This doesn't fix the
motor bug, but I've wanted to do this for over twenty years and at least
I know what's not causing the bug. However, disabling fold_constants in
expr_algebra.c does "fix" things, so it's still a good place to look.
Especially binary expressions. That expressions can now be reused is
what caused the need to make expression lists non-invasive: the reuse
resulted in loops in the lists. This doesn't directly affect code
generation at this stage but it will help with optimizing algebraic
expressions.
The dags are per sequence point (as per my reading of the C spec).
Finally, that little e. is cleaned up. convert_name was a bit of a pain
(in that it relied on modifying the expression rather than returning a
new one, or more that such behavior was relied on).
It's implemented as the Hodge dual, which is probably reasonable until
people complain. Both ⋆ and ! are supported, though the former is a
little hard to see in Consola.
Currently via only the group mask (which is really horrible to work
with: requires too much knowledge of implementation details, but does
the job for testing), but it got some basics working.
This gets only some very basics working:
* Algebra (multi-vector) types: eg @algebra(float(3,0,1)).
* Algebra scopes (using either the above or @algebra(TYPE_NAME) where
the above was used in a typedef.
* Basis blades (eg, e12) done via procedural symbols that evaluate to
suitable constants based on the basis group for the blade.
* Addition and subtraction of multi-vectors (only partially tested).
* Assignment of sub-algebra multi-vectors to full-algebra multi-vectors
(missing elements zeroed).
There's still much work to be done, but I thought it time to get
something into git.
Only · (dot product) and × (cross product for vector, commutator product
for geometric algebra) have been tested so far, but that involved
fighting with cpp to get it to not convert the · to \U000000b7, which
was rather annoying.
I never liked the various hacks I had come up with for representing
resource handles in Ruamoko. Structs with an int were awkward to test,
pointers and ints could be modified, etc etc. The new @handle keyword (@
used to keep handle free for use) works just like struct, union and
enum in syntax, but creates an opaque type suitable for a 32-bit handle.
The backing type is a function so v6 progs can use it without (all the
necessary opcodes exist) and no modifications were needed for
type-checking in binary expressions, but only assignment and comparisons
are supported, and (of course) nil. Tested using cbuf_t and QFile: seems
to work as desired.
I had considered 64-bit handles, but really, if more than 4G resource
objects are needed, I'm not sure QF can handle the game. However, that
limit is per resource manager, not total.
I had messed up the handling of declarators for combinations of pointer,
function, and array: the pointer would get lost (and presumably arrays
of functions etc). I think I had gotten confused and thought things were
a tree rather than a simple list, but Holub set me straight once again
(I've never regretted getting that book). Once I understood that, it was
just a matter of finding all the places that needed to be fixed. Nicely,
most of the duplicated code has been refactored and should be easier to
debug in the future.
The type system rewrite had lost some of the checks for function fields.
This puts the actual code in the one place and covers parameters as well
as globals.
Along with QuakeC's, of course. This fixes type typeredef2 test (a lot
of work for one little syntax error). Unfortunately, it came at the cost
of requiring `>>` in front of state expressions on C-style functions
(QuakeC-style functions are unaffected). Also, there are now two
shift/reduce conflicts with structs and unions (but these same conflicts
are in gcc 3.4).
This has highlighted the need for having the equivalent of the
expression tree for the declaration system as there are now several
hacks to deal with the separation of types and declarators. But that's a
job for another week.
The grammar constructs for declarations come from gcc 3.4's parser (I
think it's the last version of gcc that used bison. Also, 3.4 is still
GPL 2, so no chance of an issue there).
