The order in which keys are added to the dictionary object is
maintained. Adding a key after removing an old key adds the new key to
the end of the list rather than reusing the old key's spot.
PL_ParseLabeledArray works the same way as PL_ParseArray, but instead
takes a dictionary object. The keys of the items are ignored, and the
order is not preserved (at this stage), but this is a cleaner solution
to getting an array of objects when the definitions of those objects
need to be accessible by name as well.
It now takes a context pointer (opaque data) that holds the buffers it
uses for the temporary strings. If the context pointer is null, a static
context is used (making those uses of va NOT thread-safe). Most calls to
va use the static context, but all such calls have been formatted
consistently so they are easy to find when it comes time to do a full
audit.
I want to be able to use name references, but that requires string
items, so anything that would normally be dictionary or array (or
binary, even) would also need to accept string. This seemed to be the
cleanest solution. Any custom parser would then need to check the type
and act appropriately, but any inappropriate types have already been
pre-filtered by the standard parsers.
The array has to be allocated using byte elements and thus the size of
the array is the number of bytes, but it needs to be the actual number
of elements in the array. Problem caused by not knowing the actual type
(and C not having type variables anyway).
PL_ParseDictionary itself does only one level, but it takes care of the
key-field mappings and property list item type checking leaving the
actual parsing to a helper specified by the field. That helper is free
to call PL_ParseDictionary recursively.
The first line of the parsed item is stored and can be retrieved using
PL_Line. Line numbers not stored for dictionary keys yet. Will be 0 for
any items generated by code rather than parsed from a file or string.
They take a pointer to a free-list used for hashlinks so the hashlink
pools can be per-thread. However, hash tables that are not updated are
always thread-safe, so this affects only updates. progs_t has been set
up such that it is easy for multiple progs within one thread can share
hashlinks.
It seems the code expected octal escapes to always start with 0. This is
not the case. Also, octal escapes are limited to 3 digits (and hex to 2).
This fixes the garbled bold text in ITS.
Bill Currie
Ragnvald Maartmann-Moe IV