qf/quakeforge
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.code.sf.net/p/quake/quakeforge synced 2024-11-11 07:42:18 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
quakeforge/ruamoko/qwaq/qwaq-curses.c

1126 lines
27 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
/*
#FILENAME#
#DESCRIPTION#
Copyright (C) 2001 #AUTHOR#
Author: #AUTHOR#
Date: #DATE#
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
See the GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to:
Free Software Foundation, Inc.
59 Temple Place - Suite 330
Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA
*/
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
# include "config.h"
#endif
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
#include <curses.h>
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
#include <panel.h>
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
[qwaq] Read mouse movements Many thanks to https://gist.github.com/sylt/93d3f7b77e7f3a881603 for the necessary escape sequence to get xterm reporting mouse movement events.
2020-02-27 12:22:10 +00:00
#include <unistd.h>
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
#include "QF/dstring.h"
Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
#include "QF/progs.h"
#include "QF/sys.h"
#include "qwaq.h"
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
#include "event.h"
Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
#define always_inline inline __attribute__((__always_inline__))
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
#define QUEUE_SIZE 16
[qwaq] Ensure mouse motion reporting gets turned off It seems that xterm automatically disables it when ncurses shuts down and mate-terminal does not, or maybe a different version of something. Still, good to clean up properly.
2020-02-29 07:36:23 +00:00
#define MOUSE_MOVES_ON "\033[?1003h"// Make the terminal report mouse movements
#define MOUSE_MOVES_OFF "\033[?1003l"// Make the terminal report mouse movements
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
#define STRING_ID_QUEUE_SIZE 8 // must be > 1
[qwaq] Make command buffer larger for now A small one should be fine once threading is working.
2020-03-02 09:30:58 +00:00
#define COMMAND_QUEUE_SIZE 1280
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
#define CMD_SIZE(x) sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])
typedef enum qwaq_commands_e {
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_newwin,
qwaq_cmd_delwin,
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_getwrect,
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_new_panel,
qwaq_cmd_del_panel,
[qwaq] Implement the immediately useful panel functions
2020-02-29 04:06:58 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_hide_panel,
qwaq_cmd_show_panel,
qwaq_cmd_top_panel,
qwaq_cmd_bottom_panel,
qwaq_cmd_move_panel,
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_panel_window,
qwaq_cmd_update_panels,
qwaq_cmd_doupdate,
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_mvwaddstr,
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_waddstr,
[qwaq] Add mvwaddch and ACS support
2020-03-02 09:24:45 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_mvwaddch,
[qwaq] Don't call wrefresh in cmd_mvwaddstr There is now an implementation for wrefresh.
2020-02-29 05:43:08 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_wrefresh,
[qwaq] Implement basic color support
2020-02-29 05:48:18 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_init_pair,
qwaq_cmd_wbkgd,
[qwaq] Fail at object oriented design 101 This is horrible, doesn't work, isn't really the direction I want to go (that became apparent while implementing Screen's handleEvent) and crashes anyway (Array and not-id...) *sigh* Still, this does have some good stuff in it, and it pushed qfcc along some more.
2020-03-03 12:30:47 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_scrollok,
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
} qwaq_commands;
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
[qwaq] Create some ring-buffer macros I expect I will need several messaging buffers, and ring buffers tend to be quite robust. Replacing the event buffer code with the macros made testing easy.
2020-02-28 13:27:29 +00:00
#define RING_BUFFER(type, size) \
struct { \
type buffer[size]; \
unsigned head; \
unsigned tail; \
}
#define RB_buffer_size(ring_buffer) \
({ __auto_type rb = (ring_buffer); \
sizeof (rb->buffer) / sizeof (rb->buffer[0]); \
})
#define RB_SPACE_AVAILABLE(ring_buffer) \
({ __auto_type rb = &(ring_buffer); \
(rb->tail + RB_buffer_size(rb) - rb->head - 1) % RB_buffer_size(rb);\
})
#define RB_DATA_AVAILABLE(ring_buffer) \
({ __auto_type rb = &(ring_buffer); \
(rb->head + RB_buffer_size (rb) - rb->tail) % RB_buffer_size (rb); \
})
#define RB_WRITE_DATA(ring_buffer, data, count) \
({ __auto_type rb = &(ring_buffer); \
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
const typeof (rb->buffer[0]) *d = (data); \
[qwaq] Create some ring-buffer macros I expect I will need several messaging buffers, and ring buffers tend to be quite robust. Replacing the event buffer code with the macros made testing easy.
2020-02-28 13:27:29 +00:00
unsigned c = (count); \
unsigned h = rb->head; \
rb->head = (h + c) % RB_buffer_size (rb); \
if (c > RB_buffer_size (rb) - h) { \
memcpy (rb->buffer + h, d, \
(RB_buffer_size (rb) - h) * sizeof (rb->buffer[0])); \
c -= RB_buffer_size (rb) - h; \
d += RB_buffer_size (rb) - h; \
h = 0; \
} \
memcpy (rb->buffer + h, d, c * sizeof (rb->buffer[0])); \
})
#define RB_READ_DATA(ring_buffer, data, count) \
({ __auto_type rb = &(ring_buffer); \
typeof (&rb->buffer[0]) d = (data); \
unsigned c = (count); \
unsigned oc = c; \
unsigned t = rb->tail; \
if (c > RB_buffer_size (rb) - t) { \
memcpy (d, rb->buffer + t, \
(RB_buffer_size (rb) - t) * sizeof (rb->buffer[0])); \
c -= RB_buffer_size (rb) - t; \
d += RB_buffer_size (rb) - t; \
t = 0; \
} \
memcpy (d, rb->buffer + t, c * sizeof (rb->buffer[0])); \
rb->tail = (t + oc) % RB_buffer_size (rb); \
})
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
#define RB_DROP_DATA(ring_buffer, count) \
({ __auto_type rb = &(ring_buffer); \
unsigned c = (count); \
unsigned t = rb->tail; \
rb->tail = (t + c) % RB_buffer_size (rb); \
})
#define RB_PEEK_DATA(ring_buffer, ahead) \
({ __auto_type rb = &(ring_buffer); \
rb->buffer[(rb->tail + ahead) % RB_buffer_size (rb)]; \
})
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
typedef struct window_s {
WINDOW *win;
} window_t;
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
typedef struct panel_s {
PANEL *panel;
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
int window_id;
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
} panel_t;
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
typedef struct qwaq_resources_s {
progs_t *pr;
int initialized;
[qwaq] Make stdscr available to progs
2020-02-29 05:38:54 +00:00
window_t stdscr;
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
PR_RESMAP (window_t) window_map;
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
PR_RESMAP (panel_t) panel_map;
[qwaq] Create some ring-buffer macros I expect I will need several messaging buffers, and ring buffers tend to be quite robust. Replacing the event buffer code with the macros made testing easy.
2020-02-28 13:27:29 +00:00
RING_BUFFER (qwaq_event_t, QUEUE_SIZE) event_queue;
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
RING_BUFFER (int, COMMAND_QUEUE_SIZE) command_queue;
RING_BUFFER (int, COMMAND_QUEUE_SIZE) results;
RING_BUFFER (int, STRING_ID_QUEUE_SIZE) string_ids;
dstring_t strings[STRING_ID_QUEUE_SIZE - 1];
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
} qwaq_resources_t;
static window_t *
window_new (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
PR_RESNEW (window_t, res->window_map);
}
static void
window_free (qwaq_resources_t *res, window_t *win)
{
PR_RESFREE (window_t, res->window_map, win);
}
Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
static void
window_reset (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
PR_RESRESET (window_t, res->window_map);
}
static inline window_t *
window_get (qwaq_resources_t *res, unsigned index)
{
PR_RESGET(res->window_map, index);
}
static inline int
window_index (qwaq_resources_t *res, window_t *win)
{
PR_RESINDEX (res->window_map, win);
}
[qwaq] Create some ring-buffer macros I expect I will need several messaging buffers, and ring buffers tend to be quite robust. Replacing the event buffer code with the macros made testing easy.
2020-02-28 13:27:29 +00:00
static always_inline window_t * __attribute__((pure))
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
get_window (qwaq_resources_t *res, const char *name, int handle)
{
[qwaq] Make stdscr available to progs
2020-02-29 05:38:54 +00:00
if (handle == 1) {
return &res->stdscr;
}
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
window_t *window = window_get (res, handle);
if (!window || !window->win) {
PR_RunError (res->pr, "invalid window passed to %s", name + 3);
}
return window;
}
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
static panel_t *
panel_new (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
PR_RESNEW (panel_t, res->panel_map);
}
Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
static void
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
panel_free (qwaq_resources_t *res, panel_t *win)
Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
{
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
PR_RESFREE (panel_t, res->panel_map, win);
Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
}
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
static void
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
panel_reset (qwaq_resources_t *res)
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
{
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
PR_RESRESET (panel_t, res->panel_map);
}
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
static inline panel_t *
panel_get (qwaq_resources_t *res, unsigned index)
{
PR_RESGET(res->panel_map, index);
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
static inline int
panel_index (qwaq_resources_t *res, panel_t *win)
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
{
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
PR_RESINDEX (res->panel_map, win);
}
static always_inline panel_t * __attribute__((pure))
get_panel (qwaq_resources_t *res, const char *name, int handle)
{
panel_t *panel = panel_get (res, handle);
if (!panel || !panel->panel) {
PR_RunError (res->pr, "invalid panel passed to %s", name + 3);
}
return panel;
}
static int
acquire_string (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int string_id = -1;
// XXX add locking and loop for available
if (RB_DATA_AVAILABLE (res->string_ids)) {
RB_READ_DATA (res->string_ids, &string_id, 1);
}
// XXX unlock and end of loop
return string_id;
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
}
static void
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
release_string (qwaq_resources_t *res, int string_id)
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
{
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
// locking shouldn't be necessary as there should be only one writer
// but if it becomes such that there is more than one writer, locks as per
// acquire
if (RB_SPACE_AVAILABLE (res->string_ids)) {
RB_WRITE_DATA (res->string_ids, &string_id, 1);
}
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
static void
qwaq_submit_command (qwaq_resources_t *res, const int *cmd)
{
unsigned len = cmd[1];
if (RB_SPACE_AVAILABLE (res->command_queue) >= len) {
RB_WRITE_DATA (res->command_queue, cmd, len);
} else {
PR_RunError (res->pr, "command buffer full");
}
}
static void
qwaq_submit_result (qwaq_resources_t *res, const int *result, unsigned len)
{
// loop
if (RB_SPACE_AVAILABLE (res->results) >= len) {
RB_WRITE_DATA (res->results, result, len);
} else {
PR_RunError (res->pr, "result buffer full");
}
}
//XXX goes away with threads
static void process_commands (qwaq_resources_t *);
static void process_input (qwaq_resources_t *);
static void
qwaq_wait_result (qwaq_resources_t *res, int *result, int cmd, unsigned len)
{
// XXX should just wait on the mutex
process_commands (res);
process_input (res);
// locking and loop until id is correct
if (RB_DATA_AVAILABLE (res->results) >= len
&& RB_PEEK_DATA (res->results, 0) == cmd) {
RB_READ_DATA (res->results, result, len);
}
}
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
static void
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
cmd_newwin (qwaq_resources_t *res)
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
{
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
int xpos = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
int ypos = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 3);
int xlen = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 4);
int ylen = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 5);
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
window_t *window = window_new (res);
window->win = newwin (ylen, xlen, ypos, xpos);
keypad (window->win, TRUE);
int window_id = window_index (res, window);
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
int cmd_result[] = { qwaq_cmd_newwin, window_id };
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_result (res, cmd_result, CMD_SIZE (cmd_result));
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
static void
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
cmd_delwin (qwaq_resources_t *res)
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
{
int window_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
window_t *window = get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id);
delwin (window->win);
window_free (res, window);
}
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
static void
cmd_getwrect (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int window_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
int xpos, ypos;
int xlen, ylen;
window_t *window = get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id);
getparyx (window->win, ypos, xpos);
if (xpos == -1 && ypos ==-1) {
getbegyx (window->win, ypos, xpos);
}
getmaxyx (window->win, ylen, xlen);
int cmd_result[] = { qwaq_cmd_getwrect, xpos, ypos, xlen, ylen };
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_result (res, cmd_result, CMD_SIZE (cmd_result));
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
static void
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
cmd_new_panel (qwaq_resources_t *res)
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
{
int window_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
window_t *window = get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id);
panel_t *panel = panel_new (res);
panel->panel = new_panel (window->win);
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
panel->window_id = window_id;
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
int panel_id = panel_index (res, panel);
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
int cmd_result[] = { qwaq_cmd_new_panel, panel_id };
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_result (res, cmd_result, CMD_SIZE (cmd_result));
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
}
static void
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
cmd_del_panel (qwaq_resources_t *res)
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
{
int panel_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
panel_t *panel = get_panel (res, __FUNCTION__, panel_id);
del_panel (panel->panel);
panel_free (res, panel);
}
[qwaq] Implement the immediately useful panel functions
2020-02-29 04:06:58 +00:00
static void
cmd_hide_panel (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int panel_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
panel_t *panel = get_panel (res, __FUNCTION__, panel_id);
hide_panel (panel->panel);
panel_free (res, panel);
}
static void
cmd_show_panel (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int panel_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
panel_t *panel = get_panel (res, __FUNCTION__, panel_id);
show_panel (panel->panel);
panel_free (res, panel);
}
static void
cmd_top_panel (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int panel_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
panel_t *panel = get_panel (res, __FUNCTION__, panel_id);
top_panel (panel->panel);
panel_free (res, panel);
}
static void
cmd_bottom_panel (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int panel_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
panel_t *panel = get_panel (res, __FUNCTION__, panel_id);
bottom_panel (panel->panel);
panel_free (res, panel);
}
static void
cmd_move_panel (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int panel_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
int x = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 3);
int y = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 4);
panel_t *panel = get_panel (res, __FUNCTION__, panel_id);
move_panel (panel->panel, y, x);
panel_free (res, panel);
}
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
static void
cmd_panel_window (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int panel_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
panel_t *panel = get_panel (res, __FUNCTION__, panel_id);
int window_id = panel->window_id;
int cmd_result[] = { qwaq_cmd_panel_window, window_id, };
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_result (res, cmd_result, CMD_SIZE (cmd_result));
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
}
static void
cmd_update_panels (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
update_panels ();
}
static void
cmd_doupdate (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
doupdate ();
}
[qwaq] Read mouse movements Many thanks to https://gist.github.com/sylt/93d3f7b77e7f3a881603 for the necessary escape sequence to get xterm reporting mouse movement events.
2020-02-27 12:22:10 +00:00
static void
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
cmd_mvwaddstr (qwaq_resources_t *res)
[qwaq] Read mouse movements Many thanks to https://gist.github.com/sylt/93d3f7b77e7f3a881603 for the necessary escape sequence to get xterm reporting mouse movement events.
2020-02-27 12:22:10 +00:00
{
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
int window_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
int x = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 3);
int y = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 4);
int string_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 5);
window_t *window = get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id);
mvwaddstr (window->win, y, x, res->strings[string_id].str);
release_string (res, string_id);
[qwaq] Don't call wrefresh in cmd_mvwaddstr There is now an implementation for wrefresh.
2020-02-29 05:43:08 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
static void
cmd_waddstr (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int window_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
int string_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 3);
window_t *window = get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id);
waddstr (window->win, res->strings[string_id].str);
release_string (res, string_id);
}
[qwaq] Add mvwaddch and ACS support
2020-03-02 09:24:45 +00:00
static void
cmd_mvwaddch (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int window_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
int x = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 3);
int y = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 4);
int ch = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 5);
window_t *window = get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id);
mvwaddch (window->win, y, x, ch);
}
[qwaq] Don't call wrefresh in cmd_mvwaddstr There is now an implementation for wrefresh.
2020-02-29 05:43:08 +00:00
static void
cmd_wrefresh (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int window_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
window_t *window = get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id);
[qwaq] Read mouse movements Many thanks to https://gist.github.com/sylt/93d3f7b77e7f3a881603 for the necessary escape sequence to get xterm reporting mouse movement events.
2020-02-27 12:22:10 +00:00
wrefresh (window->win);
}
[qwaq] Implement basic color support
2020-02-29 05:48:18 +00:00
static void
cmd_init_pair (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int pair = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
int f = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 3);
int b = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 4);
init_pair (pair, f, b);
}
static void
cmd_wbkgd (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int window_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
int ch = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 3);
window_t *window = get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id);
wbkgd (window->win, ch);
}
[qwaq] Fail at object oriented design 101 This is horrible, doesn't work, isn't really the direction I want to go (that became apparent while implementing Screen's handleEvent) and crashes anyway (Array and not-id...) *sigh* Still, this does have some good stuff in it, and it pushed qfcc along some more.
2020-03-03 12:30:47 +00:00
static void
cmd_scrollok (qwaq_resources_t *res)
{
int window_id = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 2);
int flag = RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 3);
window_t *window = get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id);
scrollok (window->win, flag);
}
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
static void
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
process_commands (qwaq_resources_t *res)
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
{
[qwaq] Continue processing on void commands If the last command in the buffer had no parameters, its length would be only 2 and thus processing would stop before reading the command from the buffer.
2020-03-02 09:19:41 +00:00
while (RB_DATA_AVAILABLE (res->command_queue) >= 2) {
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
switch ((qwaq_commands) RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 0)) {
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_newwin:
cmd_newwin (res);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
break;
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_delwin:
cmd_delwin (res);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
break;
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_getwrect:
cmd_getwrect (res);
break;
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_new_panel:
cmd_new_panel (res);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
break;
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_del_panel:
cmd_del_panel (res);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
break;
[qwaq] Implement the immediately useful panel functions
2020-02-29 04:06:58 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_hide_panel:
cmd_hide_panel (res);
break;
case qwaq_cmd_show_panel:
cmd_show_panel (res);
break;
case qwaq_cmd_top_panel:
cmd_top_panel (res);
break;
case qwaq_cmd_bottom_panel:
cmd_bottom_panel (res);
break;
case qwaq_cmd_move_panel:
cmd_move_panel (res);
break;
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_panel_window:
cmd_panel_window (res);
break;
case qwaq_cmd_update_panels:
cmd_update_panels (res);
break;
case qwaq_cmd_doupdate:
cmd_doupdate (res);
break;
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_mvwaddstr:
cmd_mvwaddstr (res);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
break;
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_waddstr:
cmd_waddstr (res);
break;
[qwaq] Add mvwaddch and ACS support
2020-03-02 09:24:45 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_mvwaddch:
cmd_mvwaddch (res);
break;
[qwaq] Don't call wrefresh in cmd_mvwaddstr There is now an implementation for wrefresh.
2020-02-29 05:43:08 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_wrefresh:
cmd_wrefresh (res);
break;
[qwaq] Implement basic color support
2020-02-29 05:48:18 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_init_pair:
cmd_init_pair (res);
break;
case qwaq_cmd_wbkgd:
cmd_wbkgd (res);
break;
[qwaq] Fail at object oriented design 101 This is horrible, doesn't work, isn't really the direction I want to go (that became apparent while implementing Screen's handleEvent) and crashes anyway (Array and not-id...) *sigh* Still, this does have some good stuff in it, and it pushed qfcc along some more.
2020-03-03 12:30:47 +00:00
case qwaq_cmd_scrollok:
cmd_scrollok (res);
break;
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
}
RB_DROP_DATA (res->command_queue, RB_PEEK_DATA (res->command_queue, 1));
}
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
static void
add_event (qwaq_resources_t *res, qwaq_event_t *event)
{
[qwaq] Create some ring-buffer macros I expect I will need several messaging buffers, and ring buffers tend to be quite robust. Replacing the event buffer code with the macros made testing easy.
2020-02-28 13:27:29 +00:00
if (RB_SPACE_AVAILABLE (res->event_queue) >= 1) {
RB_WRITE_DATA (res->event_queue, event, 1);
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
}
}
static int
get_event (qwaq_resources_t *res, qwaq_event_t *event)
{
[qwaq] Create some ring-buffer macros I expect I will need several messaging buffers, and ring buffers tend to be quite robust. Replacing the event buffer code with the macros made testing easy.
2020-02-28 13:27:29 +00:00
if (RB_DATA_AVAILABLE (res->event_queue) >= 1) {
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
if (event) {
[qwaq] Create some ring-buffer macros I expect I will need several messaging buffers, and ring buffers tend to be quite robust. Replacing the event buffer code with the macros made testing easy.
2020-02-28 13:27:29 +00:00
RB_READ_DATA (res->event_queue, event, 1);
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
}
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
static void
mouse_event (qwaq_resources_t *res, MEVENT *mevent)
{
qwaq_event_t event = {};
event.event_type = qe_mouse;
[qwaq] Remove now unnecessary union field name \o/
2020-03-04 10:10:09 +00:00
event.mouse.x = mevent->x;
event.mouse.y = mevent->y;
event.mouse.buttons = mevent->bstate;
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
add_event (res, &event);
}
static void
key_event (qwaq_resources_t *res, int key)
{
qwaq_event_t event = {};
event.event_type = qe_key;
[qwaq] Remove now unnecessary union field name \o/
2020-03-04 10:10:09 +00:00
event.key = key;
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
add_event (res, &event);
}
static void
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
process_input (qwaq_resources_t *res)
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
{
if (Sys_CheckInput (1, -1)) {
int ch;
while ((ch = getch ()) != ERR && ch) {
fflush (stderr);
if (ch == KEY_MOUSE) {
MEVENT mevent;
getmouse (&mevent);
mouse_event (res, &mevent);
} else {
key_event (res, ch);
}
}
}
}
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
static int need_endwin;
static void
bi_shutdown (void)
{
if (need_endwin) {
[qwaq] Ensure mouse motion reporting gets turned off It seems that xterm automatically disables it when ncurses shuts down and mate-terminal does not, or maybe a different version of something. Still, good to clean up properly.
2020-02-29 07:36:23 +00:00
write(1, MOUSE_MOVES_OFF, sizeof (MOUSE_MOVES_OFF) - 1);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
endwin ();
}
}
static void
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
bi_newwin (progs_t *pr)
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int xpos = P_INT (pr, 0);
int ypos = P_INT (pr, 1);
int xlen = P_INT (pr, 2);
int ylen = P_INT (pr, 3);
int command[] = {
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_newwin, 0,
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
xpos, ypos, xlen, ylen,
};
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
int cmd_result[2];
qwaq_wait_result (res, cmd_result, qwaq_cmd_newwin, CMD_SIZE (cmd_result));
R_INT (pr) = cmd_result[1];
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
}
static void
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
bi_delwin (progs_t *pr)
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
int window_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
if (get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id)) {
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_delwin, 0, window_id, };
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
static void
bi_getwrect (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int window_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
if (get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id)) {
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_getwrect, 0, window_id, };
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
int cmd_result[5];
qwaq_wait_result (res, cmd_result, qwaq_cmd_getwrect,
CMD_SIZE (cmd_result));
// return xpos, ypos, xlen, ylen
(&R_INT (pr))[0] = cmd_result[1];
(&R_INT (pr))[1] = cmd_result[2];
(&R_INT (pr))[2] = cmd_result[3];
(&R_INT (pr))[3] = cmd_result[4];
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
}
}
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
static void
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
bi_new_panel (progs_t *pr)
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
int window_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
if (get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id)) {
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_new_panel, 0, window_id, };
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
int cmd_result[2];
qwaq_wait_result (res, cmd_result, qwaq_cmd_new_panel,
CMD_SIZE (cmd_result));
R_INT (pr) = cmd_result[1];
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Implement the immediately useful panel functions
2020-02-29 04:06:58 +00:00
static void
panel_command (progs_t *pr, qwaq_commands cmd)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int panel_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
if (get_panel (res, __FUNCTION__, panel_id)) {
int command[] = { cmd, 0, panel_id, };
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Implement the immediately useful panel functions
2020-02-29 04:06:58 +00:00
}
}
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
static void
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
bi_del_panel (progs_t *pr)
[qwaq] Implement the immediately useful panel functions
2020-02-29 04:06:58 +00:00
{
panel_command (pr, qwaq_cmd_del_panel);
}
static void
bi_hide_panel (progs_t *pr)
{
panel_command (pr, qwaq_cmd_hide_panel);
}
static void
bi_show_panel (progs_t *pr)
{
panel_command (pr, qwaq_cmd_show_panel);
}
static void
bi_top_panel (progs_t *pr)
{
panel_command (pr, qwaq_cmd_top_panel);
}
static void
bi_bottom_panel (progs_t *pr)
{
panel_command (pr, qwaq_cmd_bottom_panel);
}
static void
bi_move_panel (progs_t *pr)
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
int panel_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
[qwaq] Implement the immediately useful panel functions
2020-02-29 04:06:58 +00:00
int x = P_INT (pr, 1);
int y = P_INT (pr, 2);
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
if (get_panel (res, __FUNCTION__, panel_id)) {
[qwaq] Implement the immediately useful panel functions
2020-02-29 04:06:58 +00:00
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_move_panel, 0, panel_id, x, y, };
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Convert remaining functions to command queue Now that the initial prototype seems to be working well, it's time to implement more commands. I might have to do some wrappers for actual command writing (and result reading) as it looks like there will be a lot of nearly identical code.
2020-02-29 02:44:43 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
static void
bi_panel_window (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int panel_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
if (get_panel (res, __FUNCTION__, panel_id)) {
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_panel_window, 0, panel_id, };
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
int cmd_result[2];
qwaq_wait_result (res, cmd_result, qwaq_cmd_panel_window,
CMD_SIZE (cmd_result));
(&R_INT (pr))[0] = cmd_result[1];
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
}
}
static void
bi_update_panels (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_update_panels, 0, };
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
}
static void
bi_doupdate (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_doupdate, 0, };
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
}
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
static void
bi_mvwprintf (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int window_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
int x = P_INT (pr, 1);
int y = P_INT (pr, 2);
const char *fmt = P_GSTRING (pr, 3);
int count = pr->pr_argc - 4;
pr_type_t **args = pr->pr_params + 4;
if (get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id)) {
[qwaq] Validate window before acquiring string If the window is invalid and recovery is done, string ids will leak if acquired before validation. Afterwards, make the rest of the builtin wrappers consistent: extract parameters, validate, [acquire resources], generate command.
2020-02-29 03:33:45 +00:00
int string_id = acquire_string (res);
dstring_t *print_buffer = res->strings + string_id;
int command[] = {
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
qwaq_cmd_mvwaddstr, 0,
[qwaq] Validate window before acquiring string If the window is invalid and recovery is done, string ids will leak if acquired before validation. Afterwards, make the rest of the builtin wrappers consistent: extract parameters, validate, [acquire resources], generate command.
2020-02-29 03:33:45 +00:00
window_id, x, y, string_id
};
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
dstring_clearstr (print_buffer);
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
PR_Sprintf (pr, print_buffer, "mvwaddstr", fmt, count, args);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
}
}
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
static void
bi_wprintf (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int window_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
const char *fmt = P_GSTRING (pr, 1);
int count = pr->pr_argc - 2;
pr_type_t **args = pr->pr_params + 2;
if (get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id)) {
int string_id = acquire_string (res);
dstring_t *print_buffer = res->strings + string_id;
int command[] = {
qwaq_cmd_waddstr, 0,
window_id, string_id
};
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
dstring_clearstr (print_buffer);
PR_Sprintf (pr, print_buffer, "waddstr", fmt, count, args);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
}
}
[qwaq] Fail at object oriented design 101 This is horrible, doesn't work, isn't really the direction I want to go (that became apparent while implementing Screen's handleEvent) and crashes anyway (Array and not-id...) *sigh* Still, this does have some good stuff in it, and it pushed qfcc along some more.
2020-03-03 12:30:47 +00:00
static void
bi_wvprintf (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int window_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
const char *fmt = P_GSTRING (pr, 1);
__auto_type args = (pr_va_list_t *) &P_POINTER (pr, 2);
pr_type_t *list_start = PR_GetPointer (pr, args->list);
[qwaq] Allocate enough bytes for the args list d'oh
2020-03-04 12:17:17 +00:00
pr_type_t **list = alloca (args->count * sizeof (*list));
[qwaq] Fail at object oriented design 101 This is horrible, doesn't work, isn't really the direction I want to go (that became apparent while implementing Screen's handleEvent) and crashes anyway (Array and not-id...) *sigh* Still, this does have some good stuff in it, and it pushed qfcc along some more.
2020-03-03 12:30:47 +00:00
for (int i = 0; i < args->count; i++) {
list[i] = list_start + i * pr->pr_param_size;
}
if (get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id)) {
int string_id = acquire_string (res);
dstring_t *print_buffer = res->strings + string_id;
int command[] = {
qwaq_cmd_waddstr, 0,
window_id, string_id
};
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
dstring_clearstr (print_buffer);
PR_Sprintf (pr, print_buffer, "waddstr", fmt, args->count, list);
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
}
}
[qwaq] Add mvwaddch and ACS support
2020-03-02 09:24:45 +00:00
static void
bi_mvwaddch (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int window_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
int x = P_INT (pr, 1);
int y = P_INT (pr, 2);
int ch = P_INT (pr, 3);
if (get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id)) {
int command[] = {
qwaq_cmd_mvwaddch, 0,
window_id, x, y, ch
};
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
}
}
[qwaq] Don't call wrefresh in cmd_mvwaddstr There is now an implementation for wrefresh.
2020-02-29 05:43:08 +00:00
static void
bi_wrefresh (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int window_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
if (get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id)) {
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_wrefresh, 0, window_id, };
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Don't call wrefresh in cmd_mvwaddstr There is now an implementation for wrefresh.
2020-02-29 05:43:08 +00:00
}
}
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
static void
bi_get_event (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
qwaq_event_t *event = &G_STRUCT (pr, qwaq_event_t, P_INT (pr, 0));
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
process_commands (res);
process_input (res);
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
R_INT (pr) = get_event (res, event);
}
[qwaq] Implement basic color support
2020-02-29 05:48:18 +00:00
static void
bi_max_colors (progs_t *pr)
{
R_INT (pr) = COLORS;
}
static void
bi_max_color_pairs (progs_t *pr)
{
R_INT (pr) = COLOR_PAIRS;
}
static void
bi_init_pair (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int pair = P_INT (pr, 0);
int f = P_INT (pr, 1);
int b = P_INT (pr, 2);
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_init_pair, 0, pair, f, b, };
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Implement basic color support
2020-02-29 05:48:18 +00:00
}
static void
bi_wbkgd (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int window_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
int ch = P_INT (pr, 1);
if (get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id)) {
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_wbkgd, 0, window_id, ch, };
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
[qwaq] Move queue handling into separate functions This makes it so I need to edit only one place when I get threads working. Also, it fixes some bugs (eg, panel creation wasn't implemented correctly).
2020-03-02 09:15:31 +00:00
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
[qwaq] Add mvwaddch and ACS support
2020-03-02 09:24:45 +00:00
}
}
[qwaq] Implement basic color support
2020-02-29 05:48:18 +00:00
[qwaq] Fail at object oriented design 101 This is horrible, doesn't work, isn't really the direction I want to go (that became apparent while implementing Screen's handleEvent) and crashes anyway (Array and not-id...) *sigh* Still, this does have some good stuff in it, and it pushed qfcc along some more.
2020-03-03 12:30:47 +00:00
static void
bi_scrollok (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
int window_id = P_INT (pr, 0);
int flag = P_INT (pr, 1);
if (get_window (res, __FUNCTION__, window_id)) {
int command[] = { qwaq_cmd_scrollok, 0, window_id, flag, };
command[1] = CMD_SIZE(command);
qwaq_submit_command (res, command);
}
}
[qwaq] Add mvwaddch and ACS support
2020-03-02 09:24:45 +00:00
static const char qwaq_acs_char_map[] = "lmkjtuvwqxnos`afg~,+.-hi0pryz{|}";
static void
bi_acs_char (progs_t *pr)
{
unsigned acs = P_INT (pr, 0);
if (acs < 256) {
R_INT (pr) = NCURSES_ACS(acs);
} else if (acs - 256 < sizeof (qwaq_acs_char_map)) {
R_INT (pr) = NCURSES_ACS(qwaq_acs_char_map[acs - 256]);
} else {
R_INT (pr) = 0;
[qwaq] Implement basic color support
2020-02-29 05:48:18 +00:00
}
}
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
static void
bi_initialize (progs_t *pr)
{
qwaq_resources_t *res = PR_Resources_Find (pr, "qwaq");
initscr ();
need_endwin = 1;
res->initialized = 1;
[qwaq] Implement basic color support
2020-02-29 05:48:18 +00:00
start_color ();
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
raw ();
keypad (stdscr, TRUE);
noecho ();
nonl ();
nodelay (stdscr, TRUE);
mousemask(ALL_MOUSE_EVENTS | REPORT_MOUSE_POSITION, NULL);
[qwaq] Ensure mouse motion reporting gets turned off It seems that xterm automatically disables it when ncurses shuts down and mate-terminal does not, or maybe a different version of something. Still, good to clean up properly.
2020-02-29 07:36:23 +00:00
write(1, MOUSE_MOVES_ON, sizeof (MOUSE_MOVES_ON) - 1);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
refresh();
[qwaq] Make stdscr available to progs
2020-02-29 05:38:54 +00:00
res->stdscr.win = stdscr;
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
}
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
static void
bi_qwaq_clear (progs_t *pr, void *data)
{
__auto_type res = (qwaq_resources_t *) data;
if (res->initialized) {
[qwaq] Ensure mouse motion reporting gets turned off It seems that xterm automatically disables it when ncurses shuts down and mate-terminal does not, or maybe a different version of something. Still, good to clean up properly.
2020-02-29 07:36:23 +00:00
write(1, MOUSE_MOVES_OFF, sizeof (MOUSE_MOVES_OFF) - 1);
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
endwin ();
}
need_endwin = 0;
window_reset (res);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
panel_reset (res);
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
}
static builtin_t builtins[] = {
{"initialize", bi_initialize, -1},
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
{"create_window", bi_newwin, -1},
{"destroy_window", bi_delwin, -1},
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
{"getwrect", bi_getwrect, -1},
[qwaq] Rename the internal function names Now they reflect the curses functions they wrap. The externally visible builtin names are not changed because the parameters are in x, y order rather than curses' y, x order.
2020-02-29 03:46:25 +00:00
{"create_panel", bi_new_panel, -1},
{"destroy_panel", bi_del_panel, -1},
[qwaq] Implement the immediately useful panel functions
2020-02-29 04:06:58 +00:00
{"hide_panel", bi_hide_panel, -1},
{"show_panel", bi_show_panel, -1},
{"top_panel", bi_top_panel, -1},
{"bottom_panel", bi_bottom_panel, -1},
{"move_panel", bi_move_panel, -1},
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
{"panel_window", bi_panel_window, -1},
{"update_panels", bi_update_panels, -1},
{"doupdate", bi_doupdate, -1},
[qwaq] Read mouse movements Many thanks to https://gist.github.com/sylt/93d3f7b77e7f3a881603 for the necessary escape sequence to get xterm reporting mouse movement events.
2020-02-27 12:22:10 +00:00
{"mvwprintf", bi_mvwprintf, -1},
[qwaq] Start work on the actual app It doesn't look good, but it does have panel based windows working, and using objects. Won't build reliably right now due to qwaq being in tools and thus building before ruamoko, but I'll fix that next.
2020-02-29 15:40:55 +00:00
{"wprintf", bi_wprintf, -1},
[qwaq] Fail at object oriented design 101 This is horrible, doesn't work, isn't really the direction I want to go (that became apparent while implementing Screen's handleEvent) and crashes anyway (Array and not-id...) *sigh* Still, this does have some good stuff in it, and it pushed qfcc along some more.
2020-03-03 12:30:47 +00:00
{"wvprintf", bi_wvprintf, -1},
[qwaq] Add mvwaddch and ACS support
2020-03-02 09:24:45 +00:00
{"mvwaddch", bi_mvwaddch, -1},
[qwaq] Don't call wrefresh in cmd_mvwaddstr There is now an implementation for wrefresh.
2020-02-29 05:43:08 +00:00
{"wrefresh", bi_wrefresh, -1},
[qwaq] Implement an event queue It seems to have an issue with a bogus clearing of the screen, but the basics seem to be working.
2020-02-27 12:01:09 +00:00
{"get_event", bi_get_event, -1},
[qwaq] Implement basic color support
2020-02-29 05:48:18 +00:00
{"max_colors", bi_max_colors, -1},
{"max_color_pairs", bi_max_color_pairs, -1},
{"init_pair", bi_init_pair, -1},
{"wbkgd", bi_wbkgd, -1},
[qwaq] Fail at object oriented design 101 This is horrible, doesn't work, isn't really the direction I want to go (that became apparent while implementing Screen's handleEvent) and crashes anyway (Array and not-id...) *sigh* Still, this does have some good stuff in it, and it pushed qfcc along some more.
2020-03-03 12:30:47 +00:00
{"scrollok", bi_scrollok, -1},
[qwaq] Add mvwaddch and ACS support
2020-03-02 09:24:45 +00:00
{"acs_char", bi_acs_char, -1},
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
{0}
};
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
static __attribute__((format(printf, 1, 0))) void
qwaq_print (const char *fmt, va_list args)
{
vfprintf (stderr, fmt, args);
fflush (stderr);
}
Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
void
BI_Init (progs_t *pr)
{
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
qwaq_resources_t *res = calloc (sizeof (*res), 1);
res->pr = pr;
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
for (int i = 0; i < STRING_ID_QUEUE_SIZE - 1; i++) {
RB_WRITE_DATA (res->string_ids, &i, 1);
res->strings[i].mem = &dstring_default_mem;
}
Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
Create a basic hello world And it has begun. It has some problems, but worse, it seems I broke qfprogs and maybe pr_debug.c.
2020-02-26 16:18:38 +00:00
PR_Resources_Register (pr, "qwaq", res, bi_qwaq_clear);
PR_RegisterBuiltins (pr, builtins);
Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
Sys_RegisterShutdown (bi_shutdown);
[qwaq] Prepare for threading So far, no threading has been set up, and only window creation and printing have been updated, but the basics of the design seem to be sound. The builtin functions now no longer call ncurses directly: the build commands and write them to a command buffer. Commands that have return values (eg, window creation) write their results to a results buffer that the originating builtin function reads. Builtin functions that expect a result "poll" the results buffer for the correct result (marked by the same command). In a single UI-thread environment, the results should always be in the same order as the commands, and in a multi-UI-thread environment, things should (fingers crossed) sort themselves out as ONE of the threads will be the originator of the next available result. Strings in commands (eg, for printing) are handled by acquiring a string id (index into an array of dstring_t) and including the string id in the written command. The string id is released upon completion of the command. Builtin functions write commands, acquire string ids, and read results. The command processor reads commands, releases string ids, and writes results. Since commands, string ids, and results are all in ring buffers, and assuming there is only one thread running the builtin functions and only one thread processing commands (there can be only one because ncurses is not thread-safe), then there should never be any contention on the buffers. Of course, if there are multiple threads running the builtin functions, then locking will be required on the builtin function side.
2020-02-28 16:45:33 +00:00
Sys_SetStdPrintf (qwaq_print);
Start working on a qwaq console tool The intention is it will hopefully become a debugger. It will certainly help with development of the progs engine.
2020-02-26 13:10:59 +00:00
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink