Given an array b[] of length n, pointers to &b[0]..&b[n] are defined
(where only &b[0]..&b[n-1] can be validly dereferenced). &b[-1], or
equivalently b-1, is not something we can use in valid Standard C.
gcc 6 diagnoses this as:
code/client/snd_wavelet.c:33:9: warning: array subscript is below array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
and might take this undefined behaviour as permission to emit
"more efficient" object code that is not what the author expected,
for example nothing at all. Use a macro to fake a 1-based array instead.
- Clean up ftol()/snapvector() mess
- Make use of SSE instructions for ftol()/snapvector() if available
- move ftol/snapvector pure assembler to inline assembler, this will add x86_64 and improve support for different calling conventions
- Set FPU control word at program startup to get consistent behaviour on all platforms
* Updated TODO
* Moved ChangeLog to root
* Updated ChangeLog
* s/Foobar/Quake III Arena Source Code/
* Biggest patch EVAR. I wonder how many mail boxes this will fill...
Simon McVittie
Tim Angus
Thilo Schulz
Ludwig Nussel
Zachary Slater
Travis Bradshaw