mirror of
https://github.com/TTimo/GtkRadiant.git
synced 2024-11-10 07:11:54 +00:00
0d3393fa7b
Sure enough, they expose the "problem". I just created these based on my understanding of the code and seeing a potential problem. git-svn-id: svn://svn.icculus.org/gtkradiant/GtkRadiant/trunk@420 8a3a26a2-13c4-0310-b231-cf6edde360e5 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| maps | ||
| textures/radiant_regression_tests | ||
| README.txt | ||
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM: ======================= The sample map contains a wedge brush. The tip (the sharp edge) of the wedge is chopped off by the YZ plane (side 5, or the last side, of the brush). The height of the wedge where it is chopped is about 0.9. This makes it barely smaller than DEGENERATE_EPSILON. So the face resulting from the chop is probably degenerate, and that winding will be removed. I'm now wondering what happens to the rest of the brush. 0.9 rounded to the nearest 1/8 unit is 1/8, so the top face of the brush should get a slight raise, making the "hole" even bigger. The sides will have degenerate edges near the chop, so they will become triangles, creating open slivers in the sides. Although this behavior is a tad nasty, it is expected based on the way the code is written. I want to make sure nothing really nasty happens. I consider this regression test to be broken if there is a "hole" in the brush, and I consider this test to be very broken if something more drastic happens.