gtkradiant

History

rambetter 0d3393fa7b Finishing up the degenerate_winding2 and degenerate_winding3 regression tests. Sure enough, they expose the "problem". I just created these based on my understanding of the code and seeing a potential problem. git-svn-id: svn://svn.icculus.org/gtkradiant/GtkRadiant/trunk@420 8a3a26a2-13c4-0310-b231-cf6edde360e5		2011-01-11 02:23:58 +00:00
..
maps	Finishing up the degenerate_winding2 and degenerate_winding3 regression tests.	2011-01-11 02:23:58 +00:00
textures/radiant_regression_tests	Adding the beginnings of degenerate_winding2 and degenerate_winding3	2011-01-11 02:08:30 +00:00
README.txt	Adding the beginnings of degenerate_winding2 and degenerate_winding3	2011-01-11 02:08:30 +00:00

README.txt

DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM:
=======================

The sample map contains a wedge brush.  The tip (the sharp edge) of the wedge
is chopped off by 2 planes, leaving very narrow windings.  Each of these 2
narrow windings is less than 0.1 units tall.  However, the wedge has height
exactly equal to 1/8 unit at the point where it is chopped.  Therefore,
the two narrow sides caused by the chops are expected to be degenerate and the
top face of the wedge is expected to be unaffected.  This should leave a
"hole" in the narrow part of the wedge.

The hole isn't desirable but it's expected based on the logic in the code.
Still, if there is a hole in the brush, I consider this regression test to
be broken.