mirror of
https://github.com/TTimo/GtkRadiant.git
synced 2024-11-10 07:11:54 +00:00
f487ea7c54
be fixed for good until I look at the last bit of code that has not been examined yet, which is the plane intersection code. I want the errors to be much less than they are now, even though the disappearing_sliver* tests are now working. git-svn-id: svn://svn.icculus.org/gtkradiant/GtkRadiant/trunk@378 8a3a26a2-13c4-0310-b231-cf6edde360e5
49 lines
1.6 KiB
Text
49 lines
1.6 KiB
Text
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM:
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
The example map, maps/disappearing_sliver3.map, contains an example of this
|
|
bug. The triangle sliver surface in the middle of the room is not rendered
|
|
in the final BSP.
|
|
|
|
To trigger the bug, compile the map; you don't need -vis or -light. Only
|
|
-bsp (the first q3map2 stage) is necessary to trigger the bug. The only
|
|
entities in the map are a light and a info_player_deathmatch, so the map will
|
|
compile for any Q3 mod.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION TO PROBLEM:
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
More work has been done to BaseWindingForPlane() to make it more accurate.
|
|
This function is in polylib.c. The changes to fix this regression test were
|
|
committed in revision 377; however, those changes are not "good enough".
|
|
|
|
|
|
IN-DEPTH DISCUSSION:
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
This is the problem triangle:
|
|
|
|
In ParseRawBrush() for brush 0
|
|
Side 0:
|
|
(6144.000000 16122.000000 -2048.000000)
|
|
(6144.000000 16083.000000 -2048.000000)
|
|
(6784.000000 16241.000000 -2048.000000)
|
|
|
|
Computed winding before fix:
|
|
|
|
(6784.16406250 16241.04101562 -2048.00000000)
|
|
(6144.00000000 16122.00976562 -2048.00000000)
|
|
(6144.00000000 16083.00000000 -2048.00000000)
|
|
|
|
Obviously the 6784.16406250 is beyond epsilon error.
|
|
|
|
After revision 377:
|
|
|
|
(6783.85937500 16240.96484375 -2048.00000000)
|
|
(6144.00000000 16121.99218750 -2048.00000000)
|
|
(6144.00000000 16083.00000000 -2048.00000000)
|
|
|
|
Even though this fixes the regression test, the error in 6783.85937500 is
|
|
still greater than epsilon (but fortunately in the opposite direction). So
|
|
I don't consider this test case to be fixed quite yet.
|