mirror of
https://github.com/etlegacy/etlegacy-libs.git
synced 2025-02-24 12:11:11 +00:00
1400 lines
49 KiB
Text
1400 lines
49 KiB
Text
|
||
|
||
|
||
AVT Working Group L. Barbato
|
||
Internet-Draft Xiph.Org
|
||
Expires: January 22, 2007 July 21, 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00
|
||
RTP Payload Format for Theora Encoded Video
|
||
|
||
Status of this Memo
|
||
|
||
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
|
||
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
|
||
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
|
||
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
|
||
|
||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
|
||
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
|
||
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
|
||
Drafts.
|
||
|
||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
|
||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
|
||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
|
||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
|
||
|
||
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
|
||
|
||
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
|
||
|
||
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 22, 2007.
|
||
|
||
Copyright Notice
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
|
||
|
||
Abstract
|
||
|
||
This document describes a RTP payload format for transporting Theora
|
||
encoded video. It details the RTP encapsulation mechanism for raw
|
||
Theora data and configuration headers necessary to configure the
|
||
decoder.
|
||
|
||
Also included within the document are the necessary details for the
|
||
use of Theora with MIME and Session Description Protocol (SDP).
|
||
|
||
Editors Note
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 1]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
All references to RFC XXXX are to be replaced by references to the
|
||
RFC number of this memo, when published.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
|
||
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
|
||
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
|
||
2. Payload Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
|
||
2.1. RTP Header . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
|
||
2.2. Payload Header . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
|
||
2.3. Payload Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
|
||
2.4. Example RTP Packet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
|
||
3. Configuration Headers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
|
||
3.1. In-band Header Transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
|
||
3.1.1. Packed Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
|
||
3.2. Out of Band Transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
|
||
3.2.1. Packed Headers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
|
||
3.3. Loss of Configuration Headers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
|
||
4. Comment Headers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
|
||
5. Frame Packetizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
|
||
5.1. Example Fragmented Theora Packet . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
|
||
5.2. Packet Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
|
||
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
|
||
6.1. Mapping MIME Parameters into SDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
|
||
6.1.1. SDP Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
|
||
6.2. Usage with the SDP Offer/Answer Model . . . . . . . . . . 20
|
||
7. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
|
||
7.1. Stream Video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
|
||
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
|
||
9. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
|
||
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
|
||
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
|
||
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
|
||
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
|
||
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 25
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 2]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
1. Introduction
|
||
|
||
Theora is a general purpose, lossy video codec. It is based on the
|
||
VP3 video codec produced by On2 Technologies and has been donated to
|
||
the Xiph.org Foundation.
|
||
|
||
Theora I is a block-based lossy transform codec that utilizes an 8 x
|
||
8 Type-II Discrete Cosine Transform and block-based motion
|
||
compensation. This places it in the same class of codecs as MPEG-1,
|
||
MPEG-2, MPEG-4, and H.263. The details of how individual blocks are
|
||
organized and how DCT coefficients are stored in the bitstream differ
|
||
substantially from these codecs, however. Theora supports only intra
|
||
frames (I frames in MPEG) and inter frames (P frames in MPEG).
|
||
|
||
Theora provides none of its own framing, synchronization, or
|
||
protection against transmission errors. Instead, the codec expects
|
||
to receive a discrete sequence of data packets. Theora is a free-
|
||
form variable bit rate (VBR) codec, and these packets have no minimum
|
||
size, maximum size, or fixed/expected size. Theora packets are thus
|
||
intended to be used with a transport mechanism that provides free-
|
||
form framing, synchronization, positioning, and error correction in
|
||
accordance with these design assumptions, such as Ogg [1] or RTP/AVP
|
||
[3].
|
||
|
||
Theora I currently supports progressive video data of arbitrary
|
||
dimensions at a constant frame rate in one of several Y'CbCr color
|
||
spaces. Three different chroma subsampling formats are supported:
|
||
4:2:0, 4:2:2, and 4:4:4. The Theora I format does not support
|
||
interlaced material, variable frame rates, bit-depths larger than 8
|
||
bits per component, nor alternate color spaces such as RGB or
|
||
arbitrary multi-channel spaces. Black and white content can be
|
||
efficiently encoded, however, because the uniform chroma planes
|
||
compress well. For performance reason, arbitrary frame sizes will be
|
||
encoded rounding both dimensions to the upper multiple of 16. The
|
||
original width and height will be encoded in the header and the
|
||
decoder will use this information to clip the decoded frame to the
|
||
right dimensions.
|
||
|
||
Theora is similar to the Vorbis audio [10] in that the decoder reads
|
||
the probability model for the entropy coder and all quantization
|
||
parameters from special "header" packets at the start of the
|
||
compressed data. It is therefore impossible to decode any video data
|
||
without having previously fetched the codec info and codec setup
|
||
headers, although Theora can begin to decode at an arbitrary intra-
|
||
frame packet so long as the codec has been initialized with the
|
||
associated headers.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 3]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
1.1. Terminology
|
||
|
||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
|
||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
|
||
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [2].
|
||
|
||
|
||
2. Payload Format
|
||
|
||
For RTP based transportation of Theora encoded video the standard RTP
|
||
header is followed by a 4 octets payload header, then the payload
|
||
data. The payload headers are used to associate the Theora data with
|
||
its associated decoding codebooks as well as indicating if the
|
||
following packet contains fragmented Theora data and/or the number of
|
||
whole Theora data frames. The payload data contains the raw Theora
|
||
bitstream information.
|
||
|
||
For RTP based transport of Theora encoded video the standard RTP
|
||
header is followed by a 4 octets payload header, then the payload
|
||
data.
|
||
|
||
2.1. RTP Header
|
||
|
||
The format of the RTP header is specified in [3] and shown in Figure
|
||
1. This payload format uses the fields of the header in a manner
|
||
consistent with that specification.
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | sequence number |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| timestamp |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
|
||
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
|
||
| contributing source (CSRC) identifiers |
|
||
| ... |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 1: RTP Header
|
||
|
||
The RTP header begins with an octet of fields (V, P, X, and CC) to
|
||
support specialized RTP uses (see [3] and [4] for details). For
|
||
Theora RTP, the following values are used.
|
||
|
||
Version (V): 2 bits
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 4]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
This field identifies the version of RTP. The version used by this
|
||
specification is two (2).
|
||
|
||
Padding (P): 1 bit
|
||
|
||
Padding MAY be used with this payload format according to section 5.1
|
||
of [3].
|
||
|
||
Extension (X): 1 bit
|
||
|
||
The Extension bit is used in accordance with [3].
|
||
|
||
CSRC count (CC): 4 bits
|
||
|
||
The CSRC count is used in accordance with [3].
|
||
|
||
Marker (M): 1 bit
|
||
|
||
The Marker bit is used in accordance with [3].
|
||
|
||
Payload Type (PT): 7 bits
|
||
|
||
An RTP profile for a class of applications is expected to assign a
|
||
payload type for this format, or a dynamically allocated payload type
|
||
SHOULD be chosen which designates the payload as Theora.
|
||
|
||
Sequence number: 16 bits
|
||
|
||
The sequence number increments by one for each RTP data packet sent,
|
||
and may be used by the receiver to detect packet loss and to restore
|
||
packet sequence. This field is detailed further in [3].
|
||
|
||
Timestamp: 32 bits
|
||
|
||
A timestamp representing the presentation time of the first sample of
|
||
the first Theora packet in the RTP packet. The clock frequency MUST
|
||
be set to 90kHz.
|
||
|
||
SSRC/CSRC identifiers:
|
||
|
||
These two fields, 32 bits each with one SSRC field and a maximum of
|
||
16 CSRC fields, are as defined in [3].
|
||
|
||
2.2. Payload Header
|
||
|
||
The 4 octets following the RTP Header section represent the Payload
|
||
Header. This header is split into a number of bitfields detailing
|
||
the format of the following Payload Datagrams.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 5]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Configuration Ident | F |TDT|# pkts.|
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 2: Payload Header
|
||
|
||
Configuration Ident: 24 bits
|
||
|
||
This 24 bit field is used to associate the Theora data to a decoding
|
||
Packed Configuration.
|
||
|
||
Fragment type (F): 2 bit
|
||
|
||
This field is set according to the following list
|
||
|
||
0 = Not Fragmented
|
||
1 = Start Fragment
|
||
2 = Continuation Fragment
|
||
3 = End Fragment
|
||
|
||
This field must be zero if the number of packets field is non-zero.
|
||
|
||
Theora Data Type (TDT): 2 bits
|
||
|
||
This field sets the packet payload type for the Theora data. There
|
||
are currently three Theora payload types currently used and one
|
||
reserved for future use.
|
||
|
||
0 = Raw Theora payload
|
||
1 = Theora Packed Configuration payload
|
||
2 = Legacy Theora Comment payload
|
||
3 = Reserved
|
||
|
||
The packets with a TDT of value 3 MUST be ignored
|
||
|
||
The last 4 bits represent the number of complete packets in this
|
||
payload. This provides a maximum number of 15 Theora packets in the
|
||
payload. If the packet contains fragmented data the number of
|
||
packets MUST be set to 0.
|
||
|
||
2.3. Payload Data
|
||
|
||
Each Theora payload section starts with a two octets length header
|
||
that is used to represent the size of the following data payload,
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 6]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
followed by the raw Theora packet data.
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Payload Length | Theora Data ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 3: Payload Data
|
||
|
||
The Theora codec uses relatively unstructured raw packets containing
|
||
binary integer fields of arbitrary width that often do not fall on an
|
||
octet boundary. When a Theora encoder produces packets, unused space
|
||
in the last byte of a packet is always zeroed during the encoding
|
||
process. Thus, should this unused space be read, it will return
|
||
binary zeros.
|
||
|
||
For payloads which consist of multiple Theora packets the payload
|
||
data consists of the payload length field followed by the first
|
||
Theora packet's data, then the payload length followed by the second
|
||
Theora packet, and so on for each of the Theora packets in the
|
||
payload.
|
||
|
||
2.4. Example RTP Packet
|
||
|
||
Here is an example RTP packet containing two Theora packets.
|
||
|
||
RTP Packet Header:
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| 2 |0|0| 0 |0| PT | sequence number |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| timestamp |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| synchronisation source (SSRC) identifier |
|
||
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
|
||
| contributing source (CSRC) identifiers |
|
||
| ... |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 4: Example RTP Packet
|
||
|
||
Payload Data:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 7]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Configuration Ident | 0 | 0 | 2 pks |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Payload Length | ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Theora data ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. data | Payload Length |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Theora data |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 5: Example Theora Payload Packet
|
||
|
||
The payload portion of the packet begins with the 24 bit
|
||
Configuration ident field followed by 8 bits describing the payload.
|
||
The Fragment type field is set to 0, indicating that this packet
|
||
contains whole Theora frame data. The Data type field is set to 0
|
||
(theora raw data). The number of whole Theora data packets is set to
|
||
2.
|
||
|
||
Each of the payload blocks starts with the two octets length field
|
||
followed by the variable length Theora packet data.
|
||
|
||
|
||
3. Configuration Headers
|
||
|
||
To decode a Theora stream three configuration header packets are
|
||
needed. The first (Identification Header) indicates frame
|
||
dimensions, quality, blocks used and Theora encoder version. The
|
||
second (Comment Header) contains stream metadata and the third (Setup
|
||
Header) contains details of the dequantization and Huffman tables.
|
||
|
||
Since this information must be transmitted reliably, and as the RTP
|
||
stream may change certain configuration data mid-session, there are
|
||
different methods for delivering this configuration data to a client,
|
||
both in-band and out-of-band, which are detailed below. SDP delivery
|
||
is used to set up an initial state for the client application. The
|
||
changes may be due to different dequantization and Huffman tables as
|
||
well as different bitrates of the stream.
|
||
|
||
The delivery vectors in use are specified by an SDP attribute that
|
||
indicates the method and the optional URI where the Theora Packed
|
||
Configuration (Section 3.1.1) Packets could be fetched. Different
|
||
delivery methods MAY be advertised for the same session. The in-band
|
||
codebook delivery SHOULD be considered as baseline, out-of-band
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 8]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
delivery methods that don't use RTP will not be described in this
|
||
document. For non chained streams, the RECOMMENDED Configuration
|
||
delivery method is inline the Packed Configuration (Section 3.1.1) in
|
||
the SDP as explained in the IANA considerations (Section 6.1)
|
||
|
||
The 24 bit Ident field is used to map which Configuration will be
|
||
used to decode a packet. When the Ident field changes, it indicates
|
||
that a change in the stream has taken place. The client application
|
||
MUST have in advance the correct configuration and if the client
|
||
detects a change in the Ident value and does not have this
|
||
information it MUST NOT decode the raw data associated until it has
|
||
fetched the correct Configuration.
|
||
|
||
3.1. In-band Header Transmission
|
||
|
||
The Packed Configuration (Section 3.1.1) Payload is sent in-band with
|
||
the packet type bits set to match the payload type. Clients MUST be
|
||
capable of dealing with periodic re-transmission of the configuration
|
||
headers.
|
||
|
||
3.1.1. Packed Configuration
|
||
|
||
A Theora Packed Configuration is identified by a payload type field
|
||
of 1. Of the three headers, defined in the Theora I specification
|
||
[16], the identification and the setup will be packed together, while
|
||
the comment header will be completely suppressed. It is up to the
|
||
client to provide a minimal size comment header to the decoder if
|
||
required by the implementation.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 9]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | xxxx |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| xxxxx |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
|
||
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
|
||
| contributing source (CSRC) identifiers |
|
||
| ... |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Configuration Ident | 0 | 1 | 1|
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| length | Identification ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Identification ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Identification ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Identification |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. | Setup ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Setup ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Setup |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 6: Packed Configuration Figure
|
||
|
||
The Ident field is set with the value that will be used by the Raw
|
||
Payload Packets to address this Configuration. The Fragment type is
|
||
set to 0 since the packet bears full Packed configuration, the number
|
||
of packet is set to 1. In practice, Packed Headers usually need to
|
||
be fragmented to fit the path MTU.
|
||
|
||
3.2. Out of Band Transmission
|
||
|
||
This section, as stated above, does not cover all the possible out-
|
||
of-band delivery methods since they rely on different protocols and
|
||
are linked to specific applications. The following packet definition
|
||
SHOULD be used in out-of-band delivery and MUST be used when
|
||
Configuration is inlined in the SDP.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 10]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
3.2.1. Packed Headers
|
||
|
||
As mentioned above, the recommended delivery vector for Theora
|
||
configuration data is via a retrieval method that can be performed
|
||
using a reliable transport protocol. As the RTP headers are not
|
||
required for this method of delivery the structure of the
|
||
configuration data is slightly different. The packed header starts
|
||
with a 32 bit count field which details the number of packed headers
|
||
that are contained in the bundle. Next is the Packed header payload
|
||
for each setup id.
|
||
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Number of packed headers |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Packed header |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Packed header |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 7: Packed Headers Overview
|
||
|
||
Since the Configuration Ident and the Identification Header are fixed
|
||
length there is only a 16bit Length tag to define the length of the
|
||
packed headers.
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Configuration Ident | ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Length | Identification Header ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Identification Header |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Setup Header ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Setup Header |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 8: Packed Headers Detail
|
||
|
||
The key difference from the in-band format is that there is no need
|
||
for the payload header octet.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 11]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
3.2.1.1. Packed Headers IANA Considerations
|
||
|
||
The following IANA considerations MUST only be applied to the packed
|
||
headers.
|
||
|
||
MIME media type name: audio
|
||
|
||
MIME subtype: theora-config
|
||
|
||
Required Parameters:
|
||
|
||
None
|
||
|
||
Optional Parameters:
|
||
|
||
None
|
||
|
||
Encoding considerations:
|
||
|
||
This media type contains binary data.
|
||
|
||
Security Considerations:
|
||
|
||
See Section 6 of RFC XXXX.
|
||
|
||
Interoperability considerations:
|
||
|
||
None
|
||
|
||
Published specification:
|
||
|
||
RFC XXXX [RFC Editor: please replace by the RFC number of this
|
||
memo, when published]
|
||
|
||
Applications which use this media type:
|
||
|
||
Theora encoded video, configuration data.
|
||
|
||
Additional information:
|
||
|
||
None
|
||
|
||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||
|
||
Luca Barbato: <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
|
||
IETF Audio/Video Transport Working Group
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 12]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
Intended usage: COMMON
|
||
|
||
Restriction on usage:
|
||
|
||
This media type does not depend on the transport.
|
||
|
||
Author:
|
||
|
||
Luca Barbato
|
||
|
||
Change controller:
|
||
|
||
IETF AVT Working Group
|
||
|
||
3.3. Loss of Configuration Headers
|
||
|
||
Unlike the loss of raw Theora payload data, the loss of a
|
||
configuration header can lead to a situation where it will not be
|
||
possible to successfully decode the stream.
|
||
|
||
A loss of a Configuration Packet causes the stream decoder to halt
|
||
and SHOULD be reported to the client as well as a loss report sent
|
||
via RTCP.
|
||
|
||
|
||
4. Comment Headers
|
||
|
||
When the payload type is set to 2, the packet contains comment
|
||
metadata such as artist name, track title and so on. These metadata
|
||
messages are not intended to be fully descriptive but to offer basic
|
||
title information. Clients MAY choose to completely ignore them.
|
||
The details on the comments format can be found in the Theora
|
||
documentation [16].
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 13]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | xxxx |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| xxxxx |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
|
||
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
|
||
| contributing source (CSRC) identifiers |
|
||
| ... |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Configuration Ident | 0 | 2 | 1|
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| length | Comment ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Comment ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Comment |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 9: Comment Packet
|
||
|
||
The 2 byte length field is necessary since this Theora packet could
|
||
be fragmented.
|
||
|
||
|
||
5. Frame Packetizing
|
||
|
||
Each RTP packet contains either one complete Theora packet, one
|
||
Theora packet fragment, or an integer number of complete Theora
|
||
packets (up to a maximum of 15 packets, since the number of packets
|
||
is defined by a 4 bit value).
|
||
|
||
Any Theora data packet that is less than path MTU SHOULD be bundled
|
||
in the RTP packet with as many Theora packets as will fit, up to a
|
||
maximum of 15. Path MTU is detailed in [7] and [8].
|
||
|
||
A fragmented packet has a zero in the last four bits of the payload
|
||
header. The RTP packet containing the first fragment will set the
|
||
Fragment type to 1. Each RTP packet after the first will set the
|
||
Fragment type to 2 in the payload header. The RTP packet containing
|
||
the last fragment of the Theora packet will have the Fragment type
|
||
set to 3. If the fragmented Theora packet spans only two RTP
|
||
packets, the first will set the Fragment type field to 1 and the
|
||
second will set it to 2. To maintain the correct sequence for
|
||
fragmented packet reception the timestamp field of fragmented packets
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 14]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
MUST be the same as the first packet sent, with the sequence number
|
||
incremented as normal for the subsequent RTP packets.
|
||
|
||
5.1. Example Fragmented Theora Packet
|
||
|
||
Here is an example fragmented Theora packet split over three RTP
|
||
packets. Each packet contains the standard RTP headers as well as
|
||
the 4 octets Theora headers.
|
||
|
||
Packet 1:
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | 1000 |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| xxxxx |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
|
||
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
|
||
| contributing source (CSRC) identifiers |
|
||
| ... |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Configuration Ident | 1 | 0 | 0|
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Payload Length | Theora data ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Theora data ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 10: Example Fragmented Packet (Packet 1)
|
||
|
||
In this packet the initial sequence number is 1000 and the timestamp
|
||
is xxxxx. The Fragment type field is set to one, indicating it is
|
||
the start packet of a serie of fragments. The number of packets
|
||
field is set to 0, and as the payload is raw Theora data the Theora
|
||
payload type field is set to 0.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 15]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
Packet 2:
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | 1001 |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| xxxxx |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
|
||
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
|
||
| contributing source (CSRC) identifiers |
|
||
| ... |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Configuration Ident | 2 | 0 | 0|
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Payload Length | ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Theora data ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 11: Example Fragmented Packet (Packet 2)
|
||
|
||
The Fragment type field is set to 2 and the number of packets field
|
||
is set to 0. For large Theora fragments there can be several of
|
||
these type of payload packets. The maximum RTP packet size SHOULD be
|
||
no greater than the path MTU, including all RTP and payload headers.
|
||
The sequence number has been incremented by one but the timestamp
|
||
field remains the same as the initial packet.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 16]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
Packet 3:
|
||
|
||
0 1 2 3
|
||
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | 1002 |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| xxxxx |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
|
||
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
|
||
| contributing source (CSRC) identifiers |
|
||
| ... |
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Configuration Ident | 3 | 0 | 0|
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
| Payload Length | ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
.. Theora data ..
|
||
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
||
|
||
Figure 12: Example Fragmented Packet (Packet 3)
|
||
|
||
This is the last Theora fragment packet. The Fragment type filed is
|
||
set to 3 and the packet count remains set to 0. As in the previous
|
||
packets the timestamp remains set to the first packet in the sequence
|
||
and the sequence number has been incremented.
|
||
|
||
5.2. Packet Loss
|
||
|
||
As there is no error correction within the Theora stream, packet loss
|
||
will result in a loss of signal. Packet loss is more of an issue for
|
||
fragmented Theora packets as the client will have to cope with the
|
||
handling of the Fragment type field. If we use the fragmented Theora
|
||
packet example above and the first packet is lost the client MUST
|
||
detect that the next packet has the packet count field set to 0 and
|
||
the Fragment type is set to 2 and MUST drop it. The next packet,
|
||
which is the final fragmented packet, MUST be dropped in the same
|
||
manner. Feedback reports on lost and dropped packets MUST be sent
|
||
back via RTCP.[note: reordering]
|
||
|
||
If a particular multicast session has a large number of participants
|
||
care must be taken to prevent an RTCP feedback implosion, [9], in the
|
||
event of packet loss from a large number of participants.
|
||
|
||
Loss of any of the Configuration fragment will result in the loss of
|
||
the full Configuration packet as detailed in the Loss of
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 17]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
Configuration Headers (Section 3.3) section.
|
||
|
||
|
||
6. IANA Considerations
|
||
|
||
MIME media type name: video
|
||
|
||
MIME subtype: theora
|
||
|
||
Required Parameters:
|
||
|
||
sampling: Determines the chroma subsampling format.
|
||
|
||
width: Determines the number of pixels per line. This is an
|
||
integer between 1 and 1048561 and MUST be in multiples of 16.
|
||
|
||
height: Determines the number of lines per frame encoded. This is
|
||
an integer between 1 and 1048561 and MUST be in multiples of
|
||
16.
|
||
|
||
delivery-method: indicates the delivery methods in use, the
|
||
possible values are: inline, in_band, out_band/specific_name
|
||
Where "specific_name" is the name of the out of band delivery
|
||
method.
|
||
|
||
configuration: the base16 [11] (hexadecimal) representation of the
|
||
Packed Headers (Section 3.2.1).
|
||
|
||
Optional Parameters:
|
||
|
||
configuration-uri: the URI of the configuration headers in case of
|
||
out of band transmission. In the form of
|
||
"protocol://path/to/resource/". Depending on the specific
|
||
method the single ident packets could be retrived by their
|
||
number or aggregated in a single stream, aggregates MAY be
|
||
compressed using gzip [12] or bzip2 [14] and an sha1 [13]
|
||
checksum MAY be provided in the form of
|
||
"protocol://path/to/resource/aggregated.bz2!sha1hash"
|
||
|
||
Encoding considerations:
|
||
|
||
This media type is framed and contains binary data.
|
||
|
||
Security Considerations:
|
||
|
||
See Section 6 of RFC XXXX.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 18]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
Interoperability considerations:
|
||
|
||
None
|
||
|
||
Published specification:
|
||
|
||
RFC XXXX [RFC Editor: please replace by the RFC number of this
|
||
memo, when published]
|
||
|
||
Ogg Theora I specification: Codec setup and packet decode.
|
||
Available from the Xiph website, http://www.xiph.org
|
||
|
||
Applications which use this media type:
|
||
|
||
Audio streaming and conferencing tools
|
||
|
||
Additional information:
|
||
|
||
None
|
||
|
||
Person & email address to contact for further information:
|
||
|
||
Luca Barbato: <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
|
||
IETF Audio/Video Transport Working Group
|
||
|
||
Intended usage:
|
||
|
||
COMMON
|
||
|
||
Restriction on usage:
|
||
|
||
This media type depends on RTP framing, and hence is only defined
|
||
for transfer via RTP [3]
|
||
|
||
Author:
|
||
|
||
Luca Barbato
|
||
|
||
Change controller:
|
||
|
||
IETF AVT Working Group
|
||
|
||
|
||
6.1. Mapping MIME Parameters into SDP
|
||
|
||
The information carried in the MIME media type specification has a
|
||
specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
|
||
[6], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions. When SDP is
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 19]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
used to specify sessions the mapping are as follows:
|
||
|
||
o The MIME type ("video") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name.
|
||
|
||
o The MIME subtype ("theora") goes in SDP "a=rtpmap" as the encoding
|
||
name.
|
||
|
||
o The clock rate in the "a=rtpmap" line MUST be 90000
|
||
|
||
o The mandated parameters "delivery-method" and "configuration" MUST
|
||
be included in the SDP "a=fmpt" attribute.
|
||
|
||
o The optional parameter "configuration-uri", when present, MUST be
|
||
included in the SDP "a=fmpt" attribute and MUST follow the
|
||
delivery-method that applies.
|
||
|
||
If the stream uses multiple decoder setup configurations and all of
|
||
them are known in advance, the Configuration Packet for each file
|
||
SHOULD be packaged together and passed to the client using the
|
||
configuration attribute.
|
||
|
||
The URI specified in the configuration-uri attribute MUST point to a
|
||
location where all of the Configuration Packets needed for the life
|
||
of the session reside.
|
||
|
||
6.1.1. SDP Example
|
||
|
||
The following example shows a basic SDP for a single stream. The
|
||
first configuration packet is inlined in the sdp, other
|
||
configurations could be fetched at any time from the first provided
|
||
uri using or all the known configuration could be downloaded using
|
||
the second uri. The inline base16 [11] configuration string is
|
||
omitted because of the lenght.
|
||
c=IN IP4 192.0.0.1
|
||
m=video RTP/AVP 98
|
||
a=rtpmap:98 theora/90000
|
||
a=fmtp:98 sampling=YCbCr-4:2:2; width=1280; height=720; delivery-
|
||
method=inline; configuration=base16string1; delivery-
|
||
method=out_band/rtsp; delivery-method=out_band/rtsp;
|
||
configuration-uri=rtsp://path/to/resource/; delivery-
|
||
method=out_band/http; configuration-uri=http://another/path/to/
|
||
resource/aggregate.bz2!sha1hash;
|
||
|
||
6.2. Usage with the SDP Offer/Answer Model
|
||
|
||
The offer, as described in An Offer/Answer Model Session Description
|
||
Protocol [5], may contain a large number of delivery methods per
|
||
single fmtp attribute, the answerer MUST remove every delivery-method
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 20]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
and configuration-uri not supported. All the parameters MUST not be
|
||
altered on answer otherwise.
|
||
|
||
|
||
7. Examples
|
||
|
||
The following examples are common usage patterns that MAY be applied
|
||
in such situations, the main scope of this section is to explain
|
||
better usage of the transmission vectors.
|
||
|
||
7.1. Stream Video
|
||
|
||
This is one of the most common situation: one single server streaming
|
||
content in multicast, the clients may start a session at random time.
|
||
The content itself could be a mix of live stream, as the wj's voice
|
||
or studio scenes, and stored streams, as the music she plays.
|
||
|
||
In this situation we don't know in advance how many codebooks we will
|
||
use. The clients can join anytime and users expect to start the
|
||
fruition of the content in a short time.
|
||
|
||
On join the client will receive the current Configuration necessary
|
||
to decode the current streams inlined in the SDP so that the decoding
|
||
will start immediately after.
|
||
|
||
When the streamed content changes the new Configuration is sent in-
|
||
band before the actual stream, and the Configuration that has to be
|
||
sent inline in the SDP updated. Since the inline method is
|
||
unreliable, an out of band fallback is provided.
|
||
|
||
The client could choose to fetch the Configuration from the alternate
|
||
source as soon it discovers a Configuration packet got lost inline or
|
||
use selective retransmission [17], if the server supports the
|
||
feature.
|
||
|
||
A serverside optimization would be to keep an hash list of the
|
||
Configurations per session to avoid packing all of them and send the
|
||
same Configuration with different Ident tags
|
||
|
||
A clientside optimization would be to keep a tag list of the
|
||
Configurations per session and don't process configuration packets
|
||
already known.
|
||
|
||
|
||
8. Security Considerations
|
||
|
||
RTP packets using this payload format are subject to the security
|
||
considerations discussed in the RTP specification [3]. This implies
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 21]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
that the confidentiality of the media stream is achieved by using
|
||
encryption. Because the data compression used with this payload
|
||
format is applied end-to-end, encryption may be performed on the
|
||
compressed data. Where the size of a data block is set care MUST be
|
||
taken to prevent buffer overflows in the client applications.
|
||
|
||
|
||
9. Acknowledgments
|
||
|
||
This document is a continuation of draft-kerr-avt-theora-rtp-00.txt
|
||
|
||
Thanks to the AVT, Ogg Theora Communities / Xiph.org, Fluendo, Ralph
|
||
Giles, Mike Smith, Phil Kerr, Timothy Terriberry, Stefan Ehmann,
|
||
Alessandro Salvatori, Politecnico di Torino (LS)^3/IMG Group in
|
||
particular Federico Ridolfo, Francesco Varano, Giampaolo Mancini,
|
||
Juan Carlos De Martin.
|
||
|
||
|
||
10. References
|
||
|
||
10.1. Normative References
|
||
|
||
[1] Pfeiffer, S., "The Ogg Encapsulation Format Version 0",
|
||
RFC 3533.
|
||
|
||
[2] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
|
||
Levels", RFC 2119.
|
||
|
||
[3] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson,
|
||
"RTP: A Transport Protocol for real-time applications",
|
||
RFC 3550.
|
||
|
||
[4] Schulzrinne, H. and S. Casner, "RTP Profile for video and Video
|
||
Conferences with Minimal Control.", RFC 3551.
|
||
|
||
[5] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model with
|
||
Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3264.
|
||
|
||
[6] Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, "SDP: Session Description
|
||
Protocol", RFC 2327.
|
||
|
||
[7] Mogul et al., J., "Path MTU Discovery", RFC 1063.
|
||
|
||
[8] McCann et al., J., "Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6",
|
||
RFC 1981.
|
||
|
||
[9] Ott, J., Wenger, S., Sato, N., Burmeister, C., and J. Rey,
|
||
"Extended RTP Profile for RTCP-based Feedback (RTP/AVPF)",
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 22]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
Internet Draft (draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-feedback-11: Work in
|
||
progress).
|
||
|
||
[10] Barbato, L., "RTP Payload Format for Vorbis Encoded Audio -
|
||
draft-ietf-avt-vorbis-rtp-00", Internet Draft (Work in
|
||
progress).
|
||
|
||
[11] Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings",
|
||
RFC 3548.
|
||
|
||
[12] Deutsch, P., "GZIP file format specification version 4.3",
|
||
RFC 1952.
|
||
|
||
[13] National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Secure Hash
|
||
Standard", May 1993.
|
||
|
||
[14] Seward, J., "libbz2 and bzip2".
|
||
|
||
10.2. Informative References
|
||
|
||
[15] "libTheora: Available from the Xiph website,
|
||
http://www.xiph.org".
|
||
|
||
[16] "Theora I specification: Codec setup and packet decode.
|
||
http://www.xiph.org/theora/doc/Theora_I_spec.pdf".
|
||
|
||
[17] Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control Protocol
|
||
Extended Reports (RTCP XR)", RFC 3611, November 2003.
|
||
|
||
[18] "ITU-T Recommendation V.42, 1994, Rev. 1. Error-correcting
|
||
Procedures for DCEs Using Asynchronous-to-Synchronous
|
||
Conversion. International Telecommunications Union. Available
|
||
from the ITU website, http://www.itu.int".
|
||
|
||
[19] "ISO 3309, October 1984, 3rd Edition. Information Processing
|
||
Systems--Data Communication High-Level Data Link Control
|
||
Procedure--Frame Structure. International Organization for
|
||
Standardization.".
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 23]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
Author's Address
|
||
|
||
Luca Barbato
|
||
Xiph.Org
|
||
|
||
Email: lu_zero@gentoo.org
|
||
URI: http://www.xiph.org/
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 24]
|
||
|
||
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtp-theora-00 July 2006
|
||
|
||
|
||
Intellectual Property Statement
|
||
|
||
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
|
||
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
|
||
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
|
||
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
|
||
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
|
||
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
|
||
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
|
||
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
|
||
|
||
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
|
||
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
|
||
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
|
||
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
|
||
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
|
||
|
||
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
|
||
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
|
||
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
|
||
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
|
||
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Disclaimer of Validity
|
||
|
||
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
|
||
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
|
||
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
|
||
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
|
||
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
|
||
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
|
||
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Copyright Statement
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject
|
||
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
|
||
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Acknowledgment
|
||
|
||
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
|
||
Internet Society.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Barbato Expires January 22, 2007 [Page 25]
|
||
|