NS/releases/valve/source/curl/docs/KNOWN_BUGS
puzl f44f16d59a made a copy
git-svn-id: https://unknownworlds.svn.cloudforge.com/ns1@168 67975925-1194-0748-b3d5-c16f83f1a3a1
2005-06-08 18:52:38 +00:00

91 lines
3.9 KiB
Text

These are problems known to exist at the time of this release. Feel free to
join in and help us correct one or more of these! Also be sure to check the
changelog of the current development status, as one or more of these problems
may have been fixed since this was written!
* IPv6 support on AIX 4.3.3 doesn't work due to a missing sockaddr_storage
struct. It has been reported to work on AIX 5.1 though.
* Running 'make test' on Mac OS X gives 4 errors. This seems to be related
to some kind of libtool problem:
http://curl.haxx.se/mail/archive-2002-03/0029.html and
http://curl.haxx.se/mail/archive-2002-03/0033.html
* libcurl does not deal nicely with files larger than 2GB
* GOPHER transfers seem broken
* configure --disable-http is not fully supported. All other protocols seem
to work to disable.
* The -m parameter does not work when using telnet with curl on Windows.
* If a HTTP server responds to a HEAD request and includes a body (thus
violating the RFC2616), curl won't wait to read the response but just stop
reading and return back. If a second request (let's assume a GET) is then
immediately made to the same server again, the connection will be re-used
fine of course, and the second request will be sent off but when the
response is to get read, the previous response-body is what curl will read
and havoc is what happens.
More details on this is found in this libcurl mailing list thread:
http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2002-08/0000.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q: My program blows up when I run lots of curl_easy_perform() calls on a
single thread
Q: My program dies when a single thread re-enters the win32 select() call
via curl_easy_perform()
Q: --- add your own flavour here ---
Single Threaded Re-Entracy
--------------------------
There is a glitch / trick to using cURL on Win32 related to re-entrancy.
This experience was gained on verion 7.9.4 using Windows NT SP3 in a banking
environment (just in case you wanted to know).
If you have already called curl_easy_perform(), and *somehow* you cause your
single thread of execution to make another call to curl_easy_perform() - the
windows socket() call used to create a new socket for the second connection
can return with 10044 / 10043 error codes.
The WSA errors we experienced are:
WSAEPROTONOSUPPORT
(10043)
Protocol not supported.
The requested protocol has not been configured into the system, or no
implementation for it exists. For example, a socket call requests a
SOCK_DGRAM socket, but specifies a stream protocol.
WSAESOCKTNOSUPPORT
(10044)
Socket type not supported.
The support for the specified socket type does not exist in this address
family. For example, the optional type SOCK_RAW might be selected in a
socket call, and the implementation does not support SOCK_RAW sockets at
all.
We have experienced this by creating a timer that ticks every 20ms, and on
the tick making a curl_easy_perform() call. The call usually completed in
about 300ms. And we expected (before this test) that the timer would NOT be
fired during a call to curl_easy_perform(), howvever, while the first
curl_easy_perform() is running a tick *is* fired by the windows API somehow,
and we then call curl_easy_perform() again - thus single threaded
re-entrancy is achieved.
Notes:
* We made sure that a new CURL structure was being used for each
curl_easy_perform() request, and that the curl_global_init() had been called
beforehand.
* I'm happy to answer any questions about this problem to try to track it
down.
* Once the socket() call started failing, there is no hope - it never works
again.
* Slowing the timer down to give each request enough time to complete solves
this problem completely.
If anyone has the source code to the WinNT implementation of socket() and
can figure out WHY this can occur, more tracing can be performed.
John Clayton <John.Clayton at barclayscapital.com>