Update DUMB to revision a9176165a2ccc56410b2004d2f5dd40b2052453a

- Changed a break to row behavior in DUMB, hopefully it doesn't break anything



SVN r4075 (trunk)
This commit is contained in:
Randy Heit 2013-02-07 22:25:58 +00:00
parent aad103c8d5
commit 13ffa8a1b8

View file

@ -1292,8 +1292,8 @@ static int update_pattern_variables(DUMB_IT_SIGRENDERER *sigrenderer, IT_ENTRY *
- If we jump, then effect a loop using an old E60, and then the pattern ends, the next pattern starts on the row corresponding to the E60.
- Theory: breakrow is not cleared when it's a pattern loop effect!
*/
//if (sigrenderer->processrow < 0xFFFE) // I have no idea if this is correct or not - FT2 is so weird :(
// sigrenderer->breakrow = channel->pat_loop_row; /* emulate bug in FT2 */
if ((sigrenderer->processrow | 0xC00) < 0xFFFE) // I have no idea if this is correct or not - FT2 is so weird :(
sigrenderer->breakrow = channel->pat_loop_row; /* emulate bug in FT2 */
} else
channel->pat_loop_row = sigrenderer->processrow + 1;
#ifdef BIT_ARRAY_BULLSHIT
@ -3832,8 +3832,10 @@ static int process_tick(DUMB_IT_SIGRENDERER *sigrenderer)
sigrenderer->processrow = sigrenderer->breakrow;
sigrenderer->breakrow = 0;
for (n = 0; n < DUMB_IT_N_CHANNELS; n++) sigrenderer->channel[n].pat_loop_end_row = 0;
} else
} else {
sigrenderer->processrow = sigrenderer->breakrow;
sigrenderer->breakrow = 0; // XXX lolwut
}
if (sigrenderer->processorder == 0xFFFF)
sigrenderer->processorder = sigrenderer->order - 1;