As with the other branch of the if/else, each element of
foundPlayerServerNames is in fact the same size as each element of
foundPlayerServerAddresses, so it was fine; but it's better to make
it obvious that we are using the right array sizes.
This function is used in the Team Arena menus
I don't think it's actually possible to reach this line with
foundPlayerServerNames < 1, because by the time we get here we have
set it to 1 + the actual number of servers; but if we did, it would
clearly underflow into foundPlayerServerNames[-1], which would be
undefined behaviour. gcc 6 diagnoses this with a warning:
code/ui/ui_main.c: In function ‘UI_BuildFindPlayerList’:
code/ui/ui_main.c:4138:16: warning: array subscript is below array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
Also correct the sizeof() invocation to make it more obviously
correct (in fact the buffers for names and addresses happen to both
be of size MAX_ADDRESSLENGTH, so it was fine, but it's good to be
obvious).
Given an array b[] of length n, pointers to &b[0]..&b[n] are defined
(where only &b[0]..&b[n-1] can be validly dereferenced). &b[-1], or
equivalently b-1, is not something we can use in valid Standard C.
gcc 6 diagnoses this as:
code/client/snd_wavelet.c:33:9: warning: array subscript is below array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
and might take this undefined behaviour as permission to emit
"more efficient" object code that is not what the author expected,
for example nothing at all. Use a macro to fake a 1-based array instead.
The goal of reproducible builds is that a rebuild of the same source
code with the same compiler, libraries, etc. should result in the same
binaries. SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH provides a standard way for build systems
to fill in the date of the latest source change, typically from a git
commit or from metadata like the debian/changelog in Debian packages.
This does not change anything if SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is not defined;
the intention is that a larger build system like a Debian package
will define it.
Please see https://reproducible-builds.org/ for more information about
reproducible builds.
Bot's lastkilledplayer was set to -1 after carrying out an ordered kill.
Later in BotChat_Random() the PlayerName function was passed -1 which
caused a "Error: PlayerName: playernum out of range" message.
I think the reason it was set to negative one is so that if the bot is
ordered to kill the player again, the bot will not say it's done and
drop the goal. Though, if the bot killed the player based on it's own
decision, it will just say it's done and drop the goal (bug?).
Let's check the time of the last kill to see if it happened since the
team order was received instead of setting lastkilledplayer to -1
after completing the team ordered kill. This fixes bot dropping goal
if target player was the last player they killed and the PlayerName
out of range error.
At the end of CL_RunCinematic, RoQShutdown sets currentHandle to -1.
This causes the return at the end to be return cinTable[-1].status.
Use return FMV_EOF when RoQShutdown is called.
I think FMV_EOF should be returned instead of FMV_IDLE which is set in
RoQShutdown because RoQShutdown is clearing out state so it can be reused
for a new cinematic.
The return value isn't actually read by the ioq3 client, renderers,
cgame, or ui.
