And they even pass validation (though it turns out there's a bug in
glslangValidator regarding specialization constants with expressions (or
possibly spirv-val, but it seems to be the former as my bug report shows
signs of activity in that direction)).
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang/issues/3748
I want to use new_field_expr for specialized field expressions instead.
However, I don't particularly like new_deffield_expr as a name, but I
can't think of anything better just yet.
So far, this affects only glsl (because only glsl marks expressions as
constexpr), but it does get specialization constant initializers for
global variables working.
Now, ctor expressions are collected and emitted after all other code,
and the ctor function being created outside of class_finish_module means
it's no longer limited to just class related initialization.
I plan to do this eventually for Ruamoko, but I need it to keep working
for now; it's rather nice having multiple languages. I expect this will
open up a lot of options for inlining, generic/template function
instantiation, etc. Right now, it's helping with specialization
constants in glsl.
Including anti-commutativity. I hadn't set them before because I was
uncertain and got conflicting answers, but when I took a look again, it
seems IEEE 754 does guarantee commutativity for multiplication and
addition, so long as NaN isn't involved (and then it seems to be because
`a==a` is always false when a is a NaN).
Both for geometric algebra and in general (since it's just in
unary_expr). However, it doesn't quite work for float stuff (eg,
`vector × vector`, but that's only because the anti-commutative flag
isn't set.
Maybe there's a different trick to making gcc see that the dimension was
already check, but this works nicely size if the two calculations
differ, there are bigger problems.
They're currently wrong since they're meant to be for specialization
constants (and that whole system is currently broken anyway) but are
instead raw code expressions, but progress is progress.
Result type and constant handling is now table-driven, resulting in the
removal of seven switch statements (and thus a lot less hassle when
extending types or expressions). Also, (u)long and (u)short are fully
implemented.
In addition, other than result type handing for boolean results, any
back-end specific implementation is now in the back-end.
It's nowhere near complete, but unary and binary expressions that are
marked as constant will not be subject to constant folding. This is
necessary for proper support of specialization constants.
The imports need their result id recorded somewhere (and the hard-coding
in qc-parse.y removed), but that's a little bit of progress getting
spir-v working.
I'm not sure what's up (I doubt it's actually ub, it's just that it took
enabling ubsan *and* link-time-optimizations to see the warning), and
the warning is technically correct, though going from -1 (int) to
0xfffffff400000000 has me stumped, but ensuring width is 2-4 does take
care of it. All because I got a weird test failure that I wound up being
unable to reproduce after rebuilding qfcc (thus the ubsan pass, but no
other sniffles).
I don't know why I thought it was a good idea to make sy_var context
dependent. Renaming sy_var to sy_def makes it a little easier to know to
use the def field, too.
While I'm not happy with the module "creation" (at least it's limited to
two places), setting it up with spir-v capabilities and memory model
seems quite nice and should play nicely with being set up from within
source code, though using uint constant expressions might be overkill.
A few more types and function parameters are set up more or less
correctly (however, the pointer storage class is hard-coded for now:
need to add attributes to everything).
It was a bit of a surprise seeing a test case fail and then succeed
after making a minor edit to help find the bug, but valgrind to the
rescue. I'm surprised nothing showed up earlier.
Thare are still many const casts, but this does get rid of one set. I
had tried to replace the paren flag with a () unary expression, but that
brought out a whole pile of places that had problems (especially
anything to do with boolean expressions).
It seems it was needed for dealing with the result expression for block
expressions, but it turns out (possibly thanks to dags), that it's easy
to check for the result value and using the appropriate call to emit the
code thus avoiding the non-executable code warning.
They can have a variety (min int and long) of backing types, so
requiring ev_invalid (which is used for struct and union).
Also, ensure is_int etc fail for handle types.
Fortunately, there was a reserved spot that could be used for the name
thus no need for a version update. The name isn't used yet but will be
for glsl support.
Each interface type (in, out, uniform etc) gets its own namespace, and
non-instanced blocks get a namespace (their block name) within the
interface namespace.
The defs for the block members are currently "allocated" to be at offset
-1, but the idea is to allow layout qualifiers to know if the member has
already been located.
I'm not sure I got all the checks right, but bsp_gbuf.geom passes the
validity (but failes due to not having implemented the application of
the qualifiers).
Attributes seem appropriate as GLSL's qualifiers affect variables rather
than types (since there's no typedef).
Not much is done with the attributes yet other than some basic error
checking (duplicates of non-layout attributes) and debug output, but
most (if not all) declarations get to the declaration code with
attributes intact.
Its grammatical usage is such that it's unambiguous with identifiers,
and is needed for parsing the glsl functions (the not() function for
boolean vectors).
I don't yet know whether the generated code is correct, but the little
functions that compute a generic type gets stored in the function's
params/return type.
Allows the parsing of the return type in the following:
@generic(vec=[vec2,vec3,vec4]) {
@vector(bool,@width(vec)) lessThan(vec x, vec y);
}
Unfortunately, can't use math in int value parameters just yet, the
processing of expressions needs to be delayed (it's currently done
immediately so type-checking happens to early).
It's not connected up yet, but does produce what looks like the correct
code.
The Ruamoko instruction set has only same-size swizzles, so a staging
temp is needed either before (grow) or after (srink) the swizzle.
Unfortunately, it looks like there might be missed optimization issues,
but at least things seem to be correct.
Their size is now calculated correctly, they can be assigned,
initialized using block initializers (vectors too!), and columns can be
indexed as vector lvalues.
Builtins calling other functions that call back into progs can get their
parameter pointers messed up resulting in all sorts of errors. Thus wrap
all callbacks to progs in PR_SaveParams/PR_RestoreParams.
Also, ditch PR_RESET_PARAMS in favor of using PR_SetupParams and move
setting pr_argc into PR_SetupParams.
This is needed for `unsigned int` or `unsigned long` in type
expressions. However, there is a problem where @vector etc complain
about just `unsigned` (which should default to int, of course).
Getting them to work properly with automake proved to be a lot of
trouble, though the bug the v6 inout test was for actually had nothing
to do with inout.
I seem to remember being here before (but now I've got a comment in the
code). It seems .params and the dag code don't like each other. Fixes
the failing inout test for v6 progs. I suspect the only reason inout
worked for v6p was the use of rcall.
It turned out that for v6 progs (due to lack of double or long) weren't
getting correctly parsed vector literals: incorrect "implicit" flag and
then a lot of brittleness around constant value conversions.
Now parameters can be declared `const`, `@in`, `@out`, `@inout`. `@in`
is redundant as it's the default, but I guess it's nice for
self-documenting code. `const` marks the parameter as read-only in the
function, `@out` and `@inout` allow the parameter to pass the value back
out (by copy), but `@out` does not initialize the parameter before
calling and returning without setting an `@out` parameter is an error
(but unfortunately, currently detected only when optimizing).
Unfortunately, it seems to have broken (only!) v6 progs when optimizing
as the second parameter gets optimized out.
The code for it and make_param were nearly identical, but it turned out
that just setting up the symbol correctly was all that was needed before
passing the spec to make_param. This will make implementing parameter
qualifiers easier (less repetition).
The version directive really does only some error checking, and
only GL_EXT_multiview and GL_GOOGLE_include_directive are supported for
extensions, but enable/disable work (but not yet warn for multiview).
Using set_line_file sort of worked with its stack, but line directives
embedded in the source (which glsl's initialization code uses) messed up
the start path for quoted include searches.
There's no direct support for namespaces in Ruamoko yet, nor even in
qfcc, but glsl's blocks bring in a bit of foundation for them, even the
concept of "using" (for blocks with no instance name).
The members don't get locations allocated to them yet, but
fstrianglest.vert compiles and links correctly otherwise.
Also, there's no error checking yet.
The unification of qc and c function symbol handling made it important
that the new symbol was a proper duplicate (minus being in a table) of
the old symbol. This fixes redeclared prototypes (especially for
qc-style functions, not encountered for c-style). Complete with unit
test :)
Other than contructors (and problems with the `out` block) qfcc can
compile fstrianglest.vert to what looks like working ruamoko code.
There's still a lot of work to do, though.
Using a struct with function pointers instead of switching on an enum
makes it much easier to add languages and, more importantly,
sub-languages like glsl's shader stage variants.
Simply referencing the original metafunc resulted in only the first
variant getting a def. Now my little test generates defs for all called
variants of a generic function.
However, I'm still not sure this is quite the direction I want to go
with making calls to generic functions, but I still need to figure out
defining them. I think making progress with the glsl front-end will
help.
Checking only the last function to be added results in false negatives
and thus duplicates when defining a generic function. eg:
genFType radians (genFType degrees);
genDType radians (genDType degrees);
genFType radians (genFType degrees) = #0;
genDType radians (genDType degrees) = #0;
Detecting generic functions needs to be done before finalizing the
function type for non-generic functions, otherwise the resulting
function type winds up being incorrect due to bogus resolution of the
return type (and probably a few other factors).
This takes care of handling the return type in function definitions as
well as declarations as
I don't know why I didn't apply the same ideas as in methoddef, maybe I
just forgot. I'm pretty sure I did methodproto first, or maybe cleaned
up methoddef much later then didn't think of methodproto. Still, the
grammar is much nicer to read now.
