Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Timothy C. McGrath
d649508b5d This took half the hair on my head. Just kidding:
cl_max_particles now lives in *part.c - in GL it dynamically changes the
amount of particles on the fly! Needless to say this is fun, and this is
proboably the third cvar that uses the callbacks function at all - which
IMHO is really a cool trick Taniwha.

However I'm losing my SANITY in r_part.c - if someone could take a look,
I'd be greatly appreciative. It should be obvious to any developer that
I'm having a few problems. :P Basically the dynamic code is completely
and totally disabled, and I hacked in code which *works* but shouldn't
EVER EVER EVER be left there after we fix this as it is downright EVIL
the way I implimented it. SW client does work, and does still work with
+set cl_max_particles - however the hacks I made to get it to do that...
*shakes head* Tread softly in there, it's a mess.

Other notes of interest:
I changed show_time so it archives its setting. Got annoyed with it. If
someone finds this change to be bad, change it back. :)

glspeed.cfg got updated with a setting of 60 for cl_max_particles. 60
works nicely, and doesn't use too much speed on my aging hardware, so
I'm sure newer systems will just plain FLY with this on.

I also changed the cl_maxfps setting as 72 is great if you aren't using
a modem !.! due to the way cl_maxfps works, the higher it goes, the more
data is sent to you by the server. This causes a heck of a lot of lost
packets if you don't have the bandwidth OR if your card can't keep up
with the framerate. Either of which is bad. I set it to 30, the default
of the cvar is 0/32 so go figure out what works best for you I say.

Let me know if this blows up in your face and ESPECIALLY let me know if
you can fix the r_part.c problems!

Misty-chan
2001-04-03 02:56:39 +00:00
Bill Currie
f5c168b8a5 sw currently can't cope with 0 particles 2001-04-02 23:38:56 +00:00
Bill Currie
cb5c262ffc qtypes.h:
remove includes of qdefs.h and compat.h
pr_comp.h:
	merge pr_comp.h from quake and qfcc, removing the copy in qfcc
cmdlib.[ch]:
	nuke the endian code.
qendian.c:
	initialise the LittleLong etc pointers at compile time rather than run
	time
com.c (both nq and qw):
	nuke the LittleLong etc init code
everything else:
	fix up after the qtypes.h cleanup
2001-03-28 17:17:56 +00:00
Bill Currie
f78b973978 move the api headers into include/QF and clean up (most of) the resulting mess.
target specific files that I don't build won't compile yet. just put QF/
infront of the offending headers.

Also move ver_check into libqfutils
2001-03-27 20:33:07 +00:00
Timothy C. McGrath
b25a437460 Very minor changes. cl_max_particles still cannot be used dynamically,
however I've removed the stupid limits that I'd accidentally left behind
in my panic to comment out the messed up code in r_part.c so software
clients now can use a setting of zero. Particles in sw clients will not
default to 2048 if you use a number less than 1 - it will now use 0.
Otherwise, I made comments to myself for when I actually fix this and
cleared up some silliness in comments I'd made. Nothing special.

Special note: To use cl_max_particles *right now* you can either set it
while playing and then restart the client (I think this should work,
it's archived. May not however) Or do this which I absolutely am
*positive* works:

clientname othercommands +set cl_max_particles number othercommands

So, again, while changing in game does not work, it at least is still
useful somewhat.

Misty-chan
2001-03-22 01:52:33 +00:00
Timothy C. McGrath
820715672b *DOH!*
I goofed up my code. cl_max_particles will not dynamically update with
this change, but ATM, this is safer until I can grok what I need to know
to fix the code I wrote.

Sorry guys,
Misty-chan
2001-03-20 00:27:22 +00:00
Timothy C. McGrath
264547d470 Okay, this patch REMOVES the -particles command line option, and adds a
new cvar: cl_max_particles. This cvar is archived, has no lower or
upper limits (well, less than 1 is not allowed) and can be changed in
game at any time.

BUGS:

Only one so far. I can't figure out why it's doing this, but in software
clients, (well, at least X11) if you set it to 1 particle, it acts like
you set it far higher. 2 acts like you set it to zero... Or maybe
it's showing 2 and I just can't see it on my 320x200 window. In any
case, the vagary must be something in the software particles code,
because I basically used the same code from the GL particles code for
this as I used for the software renderer.

If nobody can find fault with my code, I'll just make a special note in
the console help.

In any case, let me know of any problems.

Misty-chan
2001-03-18 07:04:47 +00:00
Bill Currie
87854e1a0c initial checkin of most recent newtree and nuq(?) source 2001-02-19 21:15:25 +00:00