While much is broken, especially textures, e4m8.map successfully imports
into blender 4.2-ish, and even the entity relation lines seem to work
(which surprised me as those were the first sign of trouble).
It's disabled by default because it's a runtime thing and I'm not sure I
want to keep it enabled, but it did find some issues (which I've cleaned
up), although it didn't find the problem I was looking for :P
This allows the dags code to optimize the return values, and when I make
the node killing by function calls less aggressive, should make for many
more potential CSE optimizations.
Offset casts are used heavily in geometric algebra, but doing an offset
cast on a dereferenced pointer (array index) doesn't work well for
assignments. Fixes yet another bug in my test scene :)
This takes care of ptrmove instructions, fixing the printf problem in
ptrstructinit. It might even make it possible to not break basic blocks
on function calls, which should make for some more optimization
opportunities, but that can come later.
For this to work properly, it was necessary to avoid converting alias
defs to st_alias nodes.
It also fixes ptrstructinit itself (at first, I hadn't noticed that the
test passed entirely).
It turns out the bug I was chasing in set_poses was not the data getting
lost or incorrect data being read, but the arguments to printf being set
from the parent pose `p` before `p` had actually been set.
This gets rid of the funny little self-loop edge in dags dot files that
has bothered me for a while. It was just because the node to which an
identifier was attached happened to be the parent of the identifier's
leaf node.
The fix in bdafdad0d5 for
`while (count--)` never did appeal to me. I think I understood the core
problem at the time, but I hadn't figured out how to use a var's
use/define sets to detect the write-before-read. Using them allows the
special handling for flow control to be removed, making things more
robust. The function call handling has been superfluous since the
Ruamoko instruction set required the auxiliary operands on the call
statements.
Not by much really, but using one "aux" count instead of different
types, and using functions to iterate through the statement's aux
operands makes the code easier to read.
Two birds with one stone: eliminates most of the problems with going
const-correct with expr_t, and it make dealing with internally generated
expressions at random locations much easier as the set source location
affects all new expressions created within that scope, to any depth.
Debug output is much easier to read now.
ptrmove was not treating its indirect source operand as used because the
pointer wasn't checked for its source.
This fixes part of ptrstructinit, but there's a lot more breakage in
that test: it looks like all sorts of fun with arrays.
There were a few places where some const-casts were needed, but they're
localized to code that's supposed to manipulate types (but I do want to
come up with something to clean that up).
When I implemented the st_alias handing (d8a78fc849) I was
unsure if I needed to unalias aliased defs too, but it turns out to have
been necessary: this is what caused my 2d PGA dynamics test to blow up
strangely due to the GA vector loaded from an array into a local
variable getting the local var replaced by a temp but the var itself
being read later in the code (uninitialized variable due to incorrect
optimization... oops).
When sum_expr gets a null expression as one of its args, it simply
returns the other arg, but that arg needs to have the correct type
applied.
Handle zero (null result) cross product in bivector geometric product.
Clean up types in bivector * vector geometric product.
I'm not sure the regressive product is right (overall sign), but that's
actually partly a problem in the math itself (duals and the regressive
product still get poked at, so it may be just a matter of
interpretation).
I'm not sure anything other than == or != has much meaning on anything
but scalars and pseudo scalars, but all comparisons are supported as a
simple boolean test. Any missing components are assumed to be 0. If
nothing else, it makes unit tests easier to write.
It turns out the algebra types make expression dag creation much more
difficult resulting in missed optimizations (eg, recognizing `a × a`).
This fixes the dead cross products in `⋆(s.B × ⋆s.B)`
The switch to using expression dags instead of trees meant that the
statement generator could traverse sub-expressions multiple times. This
is inefficient but usually ok if there are no side effects. However,
side effects and branches (usually from ?:, due to labels) break: side
effects happen more than once, and labels get emitted multiple times
resulting in orphaned statement blocks (and, in the end, uninitialized
temporaries).
Just running through the list of expressions in a block expression
results in label expressions within the block getting printed by
expressions that reference them and thus don't receive the correct next
pointer and wind up pointing to themselves. Printing the labels first
ensures they have the correct next pointer. However, I suspect there are
other ways things will get tangled.
I'm surprised it took almost two years to discover that I had no
quaternion multiplications in any test code, but getting an ICE for a
quaternion-vector product, and the Hadamard product for
quaternion-quaternion was a bit of a nasty surprise.
This makes a slight improvement to the commutator product in that it
removes the expand statement, but there's still the problem of (a+a)/2.
However, at least now the product is correct and slightly less abysmal.
This takes advantage of evaluate_constexpr to do all the work. Necessary
for use of basis blade constants in algebra contexts (avoids an internal
error).
This fixes the upostop-- test by auto-casting implicit constants to
unsigned (and it gives a warning for signed-unsigned comparisons
otherwise). The generated code isn't quite the best, but the fix for
that is next.
Also clean up the resulting mess, though not properly. There are a few
bogus warnings, and the legit ones could do with a review.
