In the end, it does simplify things a lot, though it helped get function
pointers working at least a bit (they're not quite the same as C yet,
but I think that's mostly that functions can be struct fields).
They should now work in generic contexts, but the pressing need to work
on arrays was due to constant expressions for element counts breaking.
As a side effect, function pointers are now a thing (and seem to work
like they do in C)
Because the symbol tables for generic functions are ephemeral (as such),
they need to be easily removed from the scope chain, it's easiest if
definitions are never added to them (instead, they get added to the
parent symbol table). This keeps handling of function declarations or
definitions and their parameter scopes simple as the function gets put
in the global scope still, and the parameter scope simply gets
reconnected to the global scope (really, the generic scope's parent)
when the parameter scope is popped within a generic scope.
Attributes seem appropriate as GLSL's qualifiers affect variables rather
than types (since there's no typedef).
Not much is done with the attributes yet other than some basic error
checking (duplicates of non-layout attributes) and debug output, but
most (if not all) declarations get to the declaration code with
attributes intact.
Now parameters can be declared `const`, `@in`, `@out`, `@inout`. `@in`
is redundant as it's the default, but I guess it's nice for
self-documenting code. `const` marks the parameter as read-only in the
function, `@out` and `@inout` allow the parameter to pass the value back
out (by copy), but `@out` does not initialize the parameter before
calling and returning without setting an `@out` parameter is an error
(but unfortunately, currently detected only when optimizing).
Unfortunately, it seems to have broken (only!) v6 progs when optimizing
as the second parameter gets optimized out.
Other than contructors (and problems with the `out` block) qfcc can
compile fstrianglest.vert to what looks like working ruamoko code.
There's still a lot of work to do, though.
That is, `@generic(...) { ... };`, which is handy for bulk declarations
(such as for glsl). This proved to be a lot harder than expected, I
suspect handling of specifiers needs a lot of work.
The expression grammar has been tidied up and some basic checks are made
of parameters to the type functions. Also, type parameters are looked up
so parsing now works properly. However, the type parameters are not used
correctly, so function generation doesn't work.
The semantics are only partially implemented (generic types not yet
generated), but the generic scope for function declarations seems to be
working as intended in that it gets inserted in the scope chain and
removed at the end of the declaration.
