The engine now requires non-v6 progs to store the log2 alignment for the
param struct in .param_alignment.
PR_EnterFunction is clearer and possibly more efficient.
Only as scalars, I still need to think about what to do for vectors and
quaternions due to param size issues. Also, doubles are not yet
guaranteed to be correctly aligned.
I've decided that setting pr.max_edicts and pr.zone_size as part of the
local progs initialization rather than in PR_LoadProgsFile makes more
sense. For one, it is unlikely for the limits to change every time progs is
reloaded. Also, they seem to be a property of the VM rather than the progs.
However, there is nothing stopping the caller from updating max_edicts and
zone_size every call.
While scan-build wasn't what I was looking for, it has proven useful
anyway: many of the sizeof errors were just noise, but a few were actual
bugs (allocating too much or too little memory).
The offset to compensate for st++ was missing.
Obviously, the code has never been tested. Found while looking at the
jump code and thinking about using 32-bit addresses for the jump tables.
I'd forgotten that ED_ConvertToPlist mangled light into light_lev and
single component angle values into a vector. This fixes much of the
breakage in qflight (but not the light levels)
It was pointed out by Blub\w (gmqcc) that OP_MUL_FV and friends were buggy
when the operands overlapped (eg, x = x.x * x) as the result would become
'x.x*x.x x.y*x.x*x.x x.z*x.x*x.x' (note the x.x squared for y and z). On
testing, sure enough the bug was present (and is a nice demonstration that
QF's VM does NOT have strict-aliasing bugs). As a very nice benefit: the
code produced by the fixes is actually faster than the broken version :).
The ruamoko code used for testing:
void (string fmt, ...) printf = #0;
vector foo (vector x)
{
x = x * x.x;
return x;
}
vector bar (vector x)
{
x = x.x * x;
return x;
}
int main ()
{
vector x = '2 3 4';
vector y = foo (x);
vector z = bar (x);
printf ("x=%v y=%v z=%v 2*x=%v\n", x, y, z, 2*x);
return 0;
}
Need to up the precision by one due to the difference between g and e, but
much prettier. Might need to rename that function :P I wish I'd thought to
check if g would work, but thanks to divVerent for the suggestion.
Normally, the order doesn't matter, but when tracing code, it becomes very
difficult to tell where the trace ends and the dump begins. Printing the
message first puts the message between the trace and the dump: much easier
:)
Aliasing the jump table to an integer broke statement_get_targetlist with
the new alias def handling, and was really wrong anyway. I probably did
that due to being fed up with things and wanting to get qfcc working again
rather than spending time getting jumpb right.
Bill Currie