From d30c895c134024562b9ff615b44e9ec4e09ed32a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Currie <bill@taniwha.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:36:42 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] [qfcc] Use correct assignment statement type

Just another minor detail lost in the assignment rewrite. With this, all
tests pass when optimizing.
---
 tools/qfcc/source/statements.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/qfcc/source/statements.c b/tools/qfcc/source/statements.c
index 37a94b81c..e58294b00 100644
--- a/tools/qfcc/source/statements.c
+++ b/tools/qfcc/source/statements.c
@@ -760,6 +760,8 @@ expr_assign (sblock_t *sblock, expr_t *e, operand_t **op)
 			sblock = statement_subexpr (sblock, src_expr, &src);
 		}
 	}
+	type = st_assign;
+
 	if (0) {
 dereference_dst:
 		// dst_expr is a dereferenced pointer, so need to un-dereference it
@@ -773,6 +775,7 @@ dereference_dst:
 			sblock = statement_subexpr (sblock, dst_expr, &dst);
 			ofs = 0;
 		}
+		type = st_ptrassign;
 	}
 	if (op) {
 		*op = src;
@@ -780,7 +783,6 @@ dereference_dst:
 	if (src == dst) {
 		return sblock;
 	}
-	type = st_assign;
 
 	s = new_statement (type, opcode, e);
 	s->opa = src;