- In SnapWeldVectorAccu() (in brush.c), raising error if any of the input

parameters are NULL (instead of just returning).  SnapWeldVectorAccu() is
going to be my next area of focus - much to be proofread there.

- Proofreading and changing FixWindingAccu().  Changes include for example if
a 3-pt winding is input, it always used to return valid.  Now, it keeps
collapsing close points until there is just one point left.  These changes 
have not been tested yet.

- There was a bug in the original FixWinding() where if a dup point was at
the end of the winding, it didn't remove it properly.  Fixed in
FixWindingAccu() (original function untouched).

- If any point is removed in FixWindingAccu(), the algorithm for removing
points is run from the beginning.  This makes things more consistent.

So right now I have to test to see what happens if FixWindingAccu() returns
a winding that has less than 3 points.  This could cause bad things to happen
such as segfault.  I just don't know yet.


git-svn-id: svn://svn.icculus.org/gtkradiant/GtkRadiant/branches/Rambetter-math-fix-experiments@406 8a3a26a2-13c4-0310-b231-cf6edde360e5
This commit is contained in:
rambetter 2011-01-04 04:26:17 +00:00
parent c53833bfbd
commit 3a15b2a305

View file

@ -287,7 +287,8 @@ void SnapWeldVectorAccu(vec3_accu_t a, vec3_accu_t b, vec3_accu_t out)
int i;
vec_accu_t ai, bi, outi;
if (a == NULL || b == NULL || out == NULL) return;
if (a == NULL || b == NULL || out == NULL)
Error("SnapWeldVectorAccu: NULL argument");
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
@ -366,24 +367,38 @@ qboolean FixWinding( winding_t *w )
return valid;
}
/*
FixWindingAccu()
removes degenerate edges from a winding
returns qtrue if the winding is valid
*/
qboolean FixWindingAccu(winding_accu_t *w)
{
// Serious doubts about this function. Will check it out later.
// This is just a copy from the original for high res data types.
// TODO: Examine this function with a fine-toothed comb.
// TODO: Write regression test that chops tip off slim triangle tip.
// TODO: Test to see what happens if our winding degenerates to less
// than 3 points.
// I still have serious doubts about this function. The caller isn't
// even using the return value.
qboolean valid = qtrue;
int i, j, k;
vec3_accu_t vec;
vec_accu_t dist;
qboolean done, valid;
if (!w) return qfalse;
valid = qtrue;
while (qtrue)
{
// NOTE: Original FixWinding() didn't remove points if the winding
// had 3 points. We may have to go back to doing that after we
// understand more about what a winding with 2 or 1 points implies.
if (w->numpoints < 2) break; // Don't remove the only remaining point.
done = qtrue;
for (i = 0; i < w->numpoints; i++)
{
if (w->numpoints == 3) return valid;
j = (i + 1) % w->numpoints;
j = (((i + 1) == w->numpoints) ? 0 : (i + 1));
VectorSubtractAccu(w->p[i], w->p[j], vec);
dist = VectorLengthAccu(vec);
@ -392,14 +407,30 @@ qboolean FixWindingAccu(winding_accu_t *w)
valid = qfalse;
SnapWeldVectorAccu(w->p[i], w->p[j], vec);
VectorCopyAccu(vec, w->p[i]);
for (k = i + 2; k < w->numpoints; k++) {
// NOTE: The new code initializes k to j + 1.
for (k = j + 1; k < w->numpoints; k++)
{
VectorCopyAccu(w->p[k], w->p[k - 1]);
}
w->numpoints--;
// The only way to finish off fixing the winding consistently and
// accurately is by fixing the winding all over again. For example,
// the point at index i and the point at index i-1 could now be
// less than the epsilon distance apart. There are too many special
// case problems we'd need to handle if we didn't start from the
// beginning.
done = qfalse;
break; // This will cause us to return to the "while" loop.
}
}
if (done) break;
}
if (w->numpoints < 3) valid = qfalse;
if (w->numpoints < 3)
{
valid = qfalse;
Sys_FPrintf(SYS_VRB, "WARNING: winding degenerated to less than 3 points in FixWindingAccu\n");
}
return valid;
}