gnustep/libs-base
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/gnustep/libs-base.git synced 2025-04-22 16:33:29 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

(IndexRange): changed to location/length from start/end.

Browse source 
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/libs/base/trunk@107 72102866-910b-0410-8b05-ffd578937521
This commit is contained in:
Andrew McCallum 1995-03-12 20:05:21 +00:00
parent 4a274bf42a
commit 55e547b282
2 changed files with 4 additions and 28 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
Headers/gnustep/base/IndexedCollecting.h
View file

@ -39,21 +39,9 @@
#include <objects/KeyedCollecting.h>
typedef struct _IndexRange {
unsigned start;
unsigned end;
unsigned location;
unsigned length;
} IndexRange;
/* Includes elements from start to end-1 Is this ugly?
I do this so I can specify a NULL range
How about this instead:
typedef struct _IndexRange {
unsigned start;
unsigned length;
}
*/
//#define MakeIndexRange(START,END) \
// ({ IndexRange __ir = {(START), (END)}; __ir; })
// USE: ((IndexRange) {(START),(END)})
#define IndexRangeInside(RANGE1,RANGE2) \
({IndexRange __a=(RANGE1), __b=(RANGE2); \

16
Source/objects/IndexedCollecting.h
View file

@ -39,21 +39,9 @@
#include <objects/KeyedCollecting.h>
typedef struct _IndexRange {
unsigned start;
unsigned end;
unsigned location;
unsigned length;
} IndexRange;
/* Includes elements from start to end-1 Is this ugly?
I do this so I can specify a NULL range
How about this instead:
typedef struct _IndexRange {
unsigned start;
unsigned length;
}
*/
//#define MakeIndexRange(START,END) \
// ({ IndexRange __ir = {(START), (END)}; __ir; })
// USE: ((IndexRange) {(START),(END)})
#define IndexRangeInside(RANGE1,RANGE2) \
({IndexRange __a=(RANGE1), __b=(RANGE2); \