From 50c6934e1c61811b37ed6e8c8996f48dc18547a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mccallum Date: Sat, 7 Sep 1996 17:58:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Remove comment about NeXT's reputation for legal intimidation. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/libs/base/trunk@1709 72102866-910b-0410-8b05-ffd578937521 --- Documentation/gnustep-faq.texi | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/gnustep-faq.texi b/Documentation/gnustep-faq.texi index 8ec8d3354..5f0cd96fc 100644 --- a/Documentation/gnustep-faq.texi +++ b/Documentation/gnustep-faq.texi @@ -704,10 +704,6 @@ proprietary implementation in significant, core, structural ways, it is far more difficult for the proprietary entities to claim copyright infringement. -With NeXT's reputation for legal intimidation (e.g. the 1991 third-party -D.O. implementation, WebRex, etc), the GNUstep community certainly needs -to concern itself with legal safety. - But the far more exciting reason for structural differences is the increased efficiency and features that come from the changes. The item above, ``@b{In what ways is the Base Library different from OpenStep's