gnustep/libs-base
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/gnustep/libs-base.git synced 2025-04-25 01:31:08 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

([IndexedCollection -removeObject:]): Now removes *all* instances of

Browse source 
ANOBJECT, not just one.
([IndexedCollection -replaceObject:withObject:]): Now replaces *all*
instances of OLDOBJECT, not just one.


git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/libs/base/trunk@1303 72102866-910b-0410-8b05-ffd578937521
This commit is contained in:
Andrew McCallum 1996-03-30 19:04:35 +00:00
parent 5054040415
commit 433dd8ef66
1 changed files with 25 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

29
Source/IndexedCollection.m
View file

@ -428,15 +428,36 @@
- (void) removeObject: anObject
{
int index = [self indexOfObject: anObject];
if (index != NO_INDEX)
int index;
/* Retain the object. Yuck, but necessary in case the array holds
the last reference to anObject. */
/* xxx Is there an alternative to this expensive retain/release? */
[anObject retain];
for (index = [self indexOfObject: anObject];
index != NO_INDEX;
index = [self indexOfObject: anObject])
[self removeObjectAtIndex: index];
[anObject release];
}
- (void) replaceObject: oldObject withObject: newObject
{
int i = [self indexOfObject: oldObject];
[self replaceObjectAtIndex: i withObject: newObject];
int index;
/* Retain the object. Yuck, but necessary in case the array holds
the last reference to anObject. */
/* xxx Is there an alternative to this expensive retain/release? */
[oldObject retain];
for (index = [self indexOfObject: oldObject];
index != NO_INDEX;
index = [self indexOfObject: oldObject])
[self replaceObjectAtIndex: index withObject: newObject];
[oldObject release];
}
@end